16
IRUS Total
Downloads
  Altmetric

Within-country age-based prioritisation, global allocation, and public health impact of a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a mathematical modelling analysis

File Description SizeFormat 
Hogan_Winskill_et_al_2021_medrxiv.pdfAccepted version978.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Hogan_Winskill_et_al_2021_SI.pdfSupporting information3.78 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Within-country age-based prioritisation, global allocation, and public health impact of a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a mathematical modelling analysis
Authors: Hogan, AB
Winskill, P
Watson, OJ
Walker, PGT
Whittaker, C
Baguelin, M
Brazeau, NF
Charles, GD
Gaythorpe, KAM
Hamlet, A
Knock, E
Laydon, DJ
Lees, JA
Løchen, A
Verity, R
Whittles, LK
Muhib, F
Hauck, K
Ferguson, NM
Ghani, AC
Item Type: Working Paper
Abstract: The worldwide endeavour to develop safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines has been extraordinary, and vaccination is now underway in many countries. However, the doses available in 2021 are likely to be limited. We extended a mathematical model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission across different country settings to evaluate the public health impact of potential vaccines using WHO-developed target product profiles. We identified optimal vaccine allocation strategies within- and between-countries to maximise averted deaths under constraints on dose supply. We found that the health impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination depends on the cumulative population-level infection incidence when vaccination begins, the duration of natural immunity, the trajectory of the epidemic prior to vaccination, and the level of healthcare available to effectively treat those with disease. Within a country we find that for a limited supply (doses for <20% of the population) the optimal strategy is to target the elderly. However, with a larger supply, if vaccination can occur while other interventions are maintained, the optimal strategy switches to targeting key transmitters to indirectly protect the vulnerable. As supply increases, vaccines that reduce or block infection have a greater impact than those that prevent disease alone due to the indirect protection provided to high-risk groups. Given a 2 billion global dose supply in 2021, we find that a strategy in which doses are allocated to countries proportional to population size is close to optimal in averting deaths and aligns with the ethical principles agreed in pandemic preparedness planning.
Issue Date: 20-Mar-2021
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/87254
DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.19.21253960
Publisher: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Copyright Statement: © 2021 It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Sponsor/Funder: Imperial College LOndon
Publication Status: Published
Appears in Collections:Department of Infectious Diseases
Faculty of Medicine
School of Public Health



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons