4
IRUS TotalDownloads
Altmetric
Maternal and fetal cardiovascular and metabolic effects of intra-operative uterine handling under general anesthesia during pregnancy in sheep
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
s41598-020-67714-y.pdf | Published version | 1.18 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Title: | Maternal and fetal cardiovascular and metabolic effects of intra-operative uterine handling under general anesthesia during pregnancy in sheep |
Authors: | Shaw, CJ Botting, KJ Niu, Y Lees, CC Giussani, DA |
Item Type: | Journal Article |
Abstract: | A cohort study of 6,500,000 human pregnancies showed an increased risk of adverse fetal outcomes following abdominal but not non-abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. This may be the consequence of uterine handling during abdominal surgery. However, there are no data on any effects on the cardiometabolic physiology of the fetus or mother in response to uterine manipulation in otherwise healthy pregnancy. Consequently, 9 sheep in late gestation were anesthetized with isofluorane and maternal and fetal catheters and flow probes were implanted to determine cardiovascular and metabolic changes during uterine handling. Uterine handling led to an acute increase in uterine artery vascular resistance, fetal peripheral vasoconstriction, a reduction in oxygen delivery to the femoral circulation, worsening fetal acidosis. There was no evidence of systemic fetal hypoxia, or changes in fetal heart rate, carotid blood flow or carotid oxygen delivery. Therefore, the data support that uterine handling during abdominal surgery under general anesthesia can impact adversely on fetal cardiometabolic health. This may provide a potential explanation linking adverse fetal outcomes in abdominal compared with non-abdominal surgery during pregnancy. The data have important implications for human fetal surgery where the uterus is handled, as operative procedures during late gestation under general maternal anesthesia become more prevalent. |
Issue Date: | 2-Jul-2020 |
Date of Acceptance: | 5-Jun-2020 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/81312 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41598-020-67714-y |
ISSN: | 2045-2322 |
Publisher: | Nature Publishing Group |
Journal / Book Title: | Scientific Reports |
Volume: | 10 |
Issue: | 1 |
Copyright Statement: | © The Author(s) 2020 This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
Sponsor/Funder: | Action Medical Research |
Funder's Grant Number: | GN2052 |
Publication Status: | Published |
Conference Place: | England |
Article Number: | ARTN 10867 |
Appears in Collections: | Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License