2
IRUS Total
Downloads
  Altmetric

Clinical review: Consensus recommendations on measurement of blood glucose and reporting glycemic control in critically ill adults

Title: Clinical review: Consensus recommendations on measurement of blood glucose and reporting glycemic control in critically ill adults
Authors: Finfer, S
Wernerman, J
Preiser, J-C
Cass, T
Desaive, T
Hovorka, R
Joseph, JI
Kosiborod, M
Krinsley, J
Mackenzie, I
Mesotten, D
Schultz, MJ
Scott, MG
Slingerland, R
Van den Berghe, G
Van Herpe, T
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: The management reporting and assessment of glycemic control lacks standardization. The use of different methods to measure the blood glucose concentration and to report the performance of insulin treatment yields major disparities and complicates the interpretation and comparison of clinical trials. We convened a meeting of 16 experts plus invited observers from industry to discuss and where possible reach consensus on the most appropriate methods to measure and monitor blood glucose in critically ill patients and on how glycemic control should be assessed and reported. Where consensus could not be reached, recommendations on further research and data needed to reach consensus in the future were suggested. Recognizing their clear conflict of interest, industry observers played no role in developing the consensus or recommendations from the meeting. Consensus recommendations were agreed for the measurement and reporting of glycemic control in clinical trials and for the measurement of blood glucose in clinical practice. Recommendations covered the following areas: How should we measure and report glucose control when intermittent blood glucose measurements are used? What are the appropriate performance standards for intermittent blood glucose monitors in the ICU? Continuous or automated intermittent glucose monitoring - methods and technology: can we use the same measures for assessment of glucose control with continuous and intermittent monitoring? What is acceptable performance for continuous glucose monitoring systems? If implemented, these recommendations have the potential to minimize the discrepancies in the conduct and reporting of clinical trials and to improve glucose control in clinical practice. Furthermore, to be fit for use, glucose meters and continuous monitoring systems must match their performance to fit the needs of patients and clinicians in the intensive care setting.
Issue Date: 14-Jun-2013
Date of Acceptance: 1-Jun-2013
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/79099
DOI: 10.1186/cc12537
ISSN: 1364-8535
Publisher: BMC
Start Page: 1
End Page: 11
Journal / Book Title: Critical Care (UK)
Volume: 17
Issue: 3
Copyright Statement: © 2013 BioMed Central Ltd
Keywords: Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Critical Care Medicine
General & Internal Medicine
INTENSIVE INSULIN THERAPY
ACCURACY
METERS
ICU
ARTERIAL
TIGHT
Blood Glucose
Clinical Trials as Topic
Consensus
Critical Illness
Glycemic Index
Humans
Observational Studies as Topic
Humans
Critical Illness
Blood Glucose
Consensus
Glycemic Index
Clinical Trials as Topic
Observational Study as Topic
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Critical Care Medicine
General & Internal Medicine
INTENSIVE INSULIN THERAPY
ACCURACY
METERS
ICU
ARTERIAL
TIGHT
Emergency & Critical Care Medicine
11 Medical and Health Sciences
Publication Status: Published
Article Number: ARTN 229
Online Publication Date: 2013-06-14
Appears in Collections:Chemistry
Biological and Biophysical Chemistry