69
IRUS Total
Downloads
  Altmetric

Bounding global aerosol radiative forcing of climate change

File Description SizeFormat 
2019RG000660.pdfPublished version14.92 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Bounding global aerosol radiative forcing of climate change
Authors: Bellouin, N
Quaas, J
Gryspeerdt, E
Kinne, S
Stier, P
Watson-Parris, D
Boucher, O
Carslaw, K
Christensen, M
Daniau, A-L
Dufresne, J-L
Feingold, G
Fiedler, S
Forster, P
Gettelman, A
Haywood, J
Lohmann, U
Malavelle, F
Mauritsen, T
McCoy, D
Myhre, G
Mülmenstädt, J
Neubauer, D
Possner, A
Rugenstein, M
Sato, Y
Schulz, M
Schwartz, S
Sourdeval, O
Storelvmo, T
Toll, V
Winker, D
Stevens, B
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Aerosols interact with radiation and clouds. Substantial progress made over the past 40 years in observing, understanding, and modeling these processes helped quantify the im balance in the Earth’s radiation budget caused by anthropogenic aerosols, called aerosol radiative forcing, but uncertainties remain large. This review provides a new range of aerosol radiative forcing over the industrial era based on multiple, traceable and arguable lines of evidence, including modelling approaches, theoretical considerations, and obser vations. Improved understanding of aerosol absorption and the causes of trends in surface radiative fluxes constrain the forcing from aerosol-radiation interactions. A robust theoretical foundation and convincing evidence constrain the forcing caused by aerosol61 driven increases in liquid cloud droplet number concentration. However, the influence of anthropogenic aerosols on cloud liquid water content and cloud fraction is less clear, and the influence on mixed-phase and ice clouds remains poorly constrained. Observed changes in surface temperature and radiative fluxes provide additional constraints. These multiple lines of evidence lead to a 68% confidence interval for the total aerosol effective radiative forcing of −1.60 to −0.65 W m−2 , or −2.0 to −0.4 W m−2 with a 90% like lihood. Those intervals are of similar width to the last Intergovernmental Panel on Cli mate Change assessment but shifted towards more negative values. The uncertainty will narrow in the future by continuing to critically combine multiple lines of evidence, especially those addressing industrial-era changes in aerosol sources and aerosol effects on liquid cloud amount and on ice clouds.
Issue Date: Mar-2020
Date of Acceptance: 3-Oct-2019
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/74392
DOI: 10.1029/2019RG000660
ISSN: 8755-1209
Publisher: American Geophysical Union
Start Page: 1
End Page: 45
Journal / Book Title: Reviews of Geophysics
Volume: 58
Issue: 1
Copyright Statement: ©2019. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: 02 Physical Sciences
04 Earth Sciences
09 Engineering
Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
Publication Status: Published
Online Publication Date: 2019-11-01
Appears in Collections:Space and Atmospheric Physics
Physics
Grantham Institute for Climate Change
Faculty of Natural Sciences