103
IRUS Total
Downloads
  Altmetric

A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials.

File Description SizeFormat 
A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials_V25_PW-HUA.docxAccepted version111.81 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open
Title: A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials.
Authors: MacLennan, S
Williamson, PR
Bekema, H
Campbell, M
Ramsay, C
N'Dow, J
MacLennan, S
Vale, L
Dahm, P
Mottet, N
Lam, T
COMPACTERS Study Group
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To develop a core outcome set (COS) applicable for effectiveness trials of all interventions for localised prostate cancer. Many treatments exist for localised prostate cancer, although it is unclear which offers the optimal therapeutic ratio; which is confounded by inconsistencies in the selection, definition, measurement and reporting of outcomes in clinical trials. PATIENTS, SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A list of 79 outcomes was derived from a systematic review of published localised prostate cancer effectiveness studies and semi-structured interviews with 15 patients with prostate cancer patients. A two-stage consensus process involving 118 patients and 56 international healthcare professionals (HCPs; cancer specialist nurses, urological surgeons and oncologists) was undertaken, consisting of a three-round Delphi survey followed by a face-to-face consensus panel meeting of 13 HCPs and eight patients. RESULTS: The final COS included 19 outcomes. In all, 12 apply to all interventions: death from prostate cancer, death from any cause, local disease recurrence, distant disease recurrence/metastases, disease progression, need for salvage therapy, overall quality of life, stress urinary incontinence, urinary function, bowel function, faecal incontinence, and sexual function. Seven were intervention-specific: perioperative deaths (surgery), positive surgical margin (surgery), thromboembolic disease (surgery), bothersome or symptomatic urethral or anastomotic stricture (surgery), need for curative treatment (active surveillance), treatment failure (ablative therapy), and side-effects of hormonal therapy (hormone therapy). The UK-centric participants may limit the generalisability to other countries, but trialists should reason why the COS would not be applicable. The default position should not be that a COS developed in one country will automatically not be applicable elsewhere. CONCLUSION: We have established a COS for trials of effectiveness in localised prostate cancer, applicable across all interventions that should be measured in all localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials.
Issue Date: 3-May-2017
Date of Acceptance: 27-Mar-2017
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/51707
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.13854
ISSN: 1464-4096
Publisher: Wiley
Start Page: E64
End Page: E79
Journal / Book Title: BJU International
Volume: 120
Issue: 5B
Copyright Statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: MacLennan, S., Williamson, P. R., Bekema, H., Campbell, M., Ramsay, C., N'Dow, J., MacLennan, S., Vale, L., Dahm, P., Mottet, N., Lam, T. and the COMPACTERS Study Group (2017), A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials. BJU Int, which has been published in final form at https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.13854. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
Keywords: Delphi survey
clinical trials
consensus group meeting
consensus process
core outcome set
localised prostate cancer
COMPACTERS Study Group
1103 Clinical Sciences
Urology & Nephrology
Publication Status: Published
Appears in Collections:Department of Surgery and Cancer