625
IRUS Total
Downloads
  Altmetric

Carbon capture in the cement industry: technologies, progress, and retrofitting

File Description SizeFormat 
CC in cement industry post-review v3.docxAccepted version498.59 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open
Hills et al 16 - Carbon capture in the cement industry (manuscript).pdfAccepted version458.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Carbon capture in the cement industry: technologies, progress, and retrofitting
Authors: Hills, T
Leeson, D
Florin, N
Fennell, P
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Several different carbon-capture technologies have been proposed for use in the cement industry. This paper reviews their attributes, the progress that has been made toward their commercialization, and the major challenges facing their retrofitting to existing cement plants. A technology readiness level (TRL) scale for carbon capture in the cement industry is developed. For application at cement plants, partial oxy-fuel combustion, amine scrubbing, and calcium looping are the most developed (TRL 6 being the pilot system demonstrated in relevant environment), followed by direct capture (TRL 4–5 being the component and system validation at lab-scale in a relevant environment) and full oxy-fuel combustion (TRL 4 being the component and system validation at lab-scale in a lab environment). Our review suggests that advancing to TRL 7 (demonstration in plant environment) seems to be a challenge for the industry, representing a major step up from TRL 6. The important attributes that a cement plant must have to be “carbon-capture ready” for each capture technology selection is evaluated. Common requirements are space around the preheater and precalciner section, access to CO2 transport infrastructure, and a retrofittable preheater tower. Evidence from the electricity generation sector suggests that carbon capture readiness is not always cost-effective. The similar durations of cement-plant renovation and capture-plant construction suggests that synchronizing these two actions may save considerable time and money.
Issue Date: 5-Jan-2016
Date of Acceptance: 2-Dec-2015
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/28937
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03508
ISSN: 0013-936X
Publisher: American Chemical Society
Start Page: 368
End Page: 377
Journal / Book Title: Environmental Science & Technology
Volume: 50
Issue: 1
Copyright Statement: This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Environmental Science & Technology, copyright © American Chemical Society after peer review and technical editing by the publisher. To access the final edited and published work see http://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5b03508
Sponsor/Funder: Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (E
Funder's Grant Number: ERI 023708/EP/K000446/1
Keywords: Science & Technology
Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Engineering, Environmental
Environmental Sciences
Engineering
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT
CO2 CAPTURE
PLANTS
Amines
Calcium
Carbon
Carbon Dioxide
Construction Materials
Electricity
Industry
Carbon Dioxide
Carbon
Calcium
Amines
Electricity
Industry
Construction Materials
Environmental Sciences
Publication Status: Published
Online Publication Date: 2015-12-17
Appears in Collections:Chemical Engineering
Grantham Institute for Climate Change
Faculty of Natural Sciences
Faculty of Engineering