625
IRUS TotalDownloads
Altmetric
Carbon capture in the cement industry: technologies, progress, and retrofitting
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CC in cement industry post-review v3.docx | Accepted version | 498.59 kB | Microsoft Word | View/Open |
Hills et al 16 - Carbon capture in the cement industry (manuscript).pdf | Accepted version | 458.12 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Title: | Carbon capture in the cement industry: technologies, progress, and retrofitting |
Authors: | Hills, T Leeson, D Florin, N Fennell, P |
Item Type: | Journal Article |
Abstract: | Several different carbon-capture technologies have been proposed for use in the cement industry. This paper reviews their attributes, the progress that has been made toward their commercialization, and the major challenges facing their retrofitting to existing cement plants. A technology readiness level (TRL) scale for carbon capture in the cement industry is developed. For application at cement plants, partial oxy-fuel combustion, amine scrubbing, and calcium looping are the most developed (TRL 6 being the pilot system demonstrated in relevant environment), followed by direct capture (TRL 4–5 being the component and system validation at lab-scale in a relevant environment) and full oxy-fuel combustion (TRL 4 being the component and system validation at lab-scale in a lab environment). Our review suggests that advancing to TRL 7 (demonstration in plant environment) seems to be a challenge for the industry, representing a major step up from TRL 6. The important attributes that a cement plant must have to be “carbon-capture ready” for each capture technology selection is evaluated. Common requirements are space around the preheater and precalciner section, access to CO2 transport infrastructure, and a retrofittable preheater tower. Evidence from the electricity generation sector suggests that carbon capture readiness is not always cost-effective. The similar durations of cement-plant renovation and capture-plant construction suggests that synchronizing these two actions may save considerable time and money. |
Issue Date: | 5-Jan-2016 |
Date of Acceptance: | 2-Dec-2015 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/28937 |
DOI: | 10.1021/acs.est.5b03508 |
ISSN: | 0013-936X |
Publisher: | American Chemical Society |
Start Page: | 368 |
End Page: | 377 |
Journal / Book Title: | Environmental Science & Technology |
Volume: | 50 |
Issue: | 1 |
Copyright Statement: | This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Environmental Science & Technology, copyright © American Chemical Society after peer review and technical editing by the publisher. To access the final edited and published work see http://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5b03508 |
Sponsor/Funder: | Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (E |
Funder's Grant Number: | ERI 023708/EP/K000446/1 |
Keywords: | Science & Technology Technology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Engineering, Environmental Environmental Sciences Engineering Environmental Sciences & Ecology LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT CO2 CAPTURE PLANTS Amines Calcium Carbon Carbon Dioxide Construction Materials Electricity Industry Carbon Dioxide Carbon Calcium Amines Electricity Industry Construction Materials Environmental Sciences |
Publication Status: | Published |
Online Publication Date: | 2015-12-17 |
Appears in Collections: | Chemical Engineering Grantham Institute for Climate Change Faculty of Natural Sciences Faculty of Engineering |