18
IRUS TotalDownloads
Altmetric
Exploring the barriers and facilitators of psychological safety in primary care teams: a qualitative study
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Barriers and facilitators of psychological safety.pdf | Published version | 683.38 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Title: | Exploring the barriers and facilitators of psychological safety in primary care teams: a qualitative study |
Authors: | Remtulla, R Hagana, A Houbby, N Ruparell, K Aojula, N Menon, A Thavarajasingam, SG Meyer, E |
Item Type: | Journal Article |
Abstract: | Background: Psychological safety is the concept by which individuals feel comfortable expressing themselves in a work environment, without fear of embarrassment or criticism from others. Psychological safety in healthcare is associated with improved patient safety outcomes, enhanced physician engagement and fostering a creative learning environment. Therefore, it is important to establish the key levers which can act as facilitators or barriers to establishing psychological safety. Existing literature on psychological safety in healthcare teams has focused on secondary care, primarily from an individual profession perspective. In light of the increased focus on multidisciplinary work in primary care and the need for team-based studies, given that psychological safety is a team-based construct, this study sought to investigate the facilitators and barriers to psychological safety in primary care multidisciplinary teams. Methods: A mono-method qualitative research design was chosen for this study. Healthcare professionals from four primary care teams (n = 20) were recruited using snowball sampling. Data collection was through semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to generate findings. Results: Three meta themes surfaced: shared beliefs, facilitators and barriers to psychological safety. The shared beliefs offered insights into the teams’ background functioning, providing important context to the facilitators and barriers of psychological safety specific to each team. Four barriers to psychological safety were identified: hierarchy, perceived lack of knowledge, personality and authoritarian leadership. Eight facilitators surfaced: leader and leader inclusiveness, open culture, vocal personality, support in silos, boundary spanner, chairing meetings, strong interpersonal relationships and small groups. Conclusion: This study emphasises that factors influencing psychological safety can be individualistic, team-based or organisational. Although previous literature has largely focused on the role of leaders in promoting psychological safety, safe environments can be created by all team members. Members can facilitate psychological safety in instances where positive leadership behaviours are lacking - for example, strengthening interpersonal relationships, finding support in silos or rotating the chairperson in team meetings. It is anticipated that these findings will encourage practices to reflect on their team dynamics and adopt strategies to ensure every member’s voice is heard. |
Issue Date: | 24-Mar-2021 |
Date of Acceptance: | 2-Mar-2021 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/88437 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12913-021-06232-7 |
ISSN: | 1472-6963 |
Publisher: | BioMed Central |
Start Page: | 1 |
End Page: | 12 |
Journal / Book Title: | BMC Health Services Research |
Volume: | 21 |
Issue: | 1 |
Copyright Statement: | © The Author(s) 2021. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
Keywords: | Community General practice Primary care Psychological safety Teamwork 0807 Library and Information Studies 1110 Nursing 1117 Public Health and Health Services Health Policy & Services |
Publication Status: | Published |
Article Number: | 269 |
Online Publication Date: | 2021-03-24 |
Appears in Collections: | Imperial College Business School |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License