7
IRUS Total
Downloads
  Altmetric

Effects of body mass index on relationship status, social contact and socio-economic position: Mendelian randomization and within-sibling study in UK Biobank

Title: Effects of body mass index on relationship status, social contact and socio-economic position: Mendelian randomization and within-sibling study in UK Biobank
Authors: Howe, LD
Kanayalal, R
Harrison, S
Beaumont, RN
Davies, AR
Frayling, TM
Davies, NM
Hughes, A
Jones, SE
Sassi, F
Wood, AR
Tyrrell, J
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Background We assessed whether body mass index (BMI) affects social and socio-economic outcomes. Methods We used Mendelian randomization (MR), non-linear MR and non-genetic and MR within-sibling analyses, to estimate relationships of BMI with six socio-economic and four social outcomes in 378 244 people of European ancestry in UK Biobank. Results In MR of minimally related individuals, higher BMI was related to higher deprivation, lower income, fewer years of education, lower odds of degree-level education and skilled employment. Non-linear MR suggested both low (bottom decile, <22 kg/m2) and high (top seven deciles, >24.6 kg/m2) BMI, increased deprivation and reduced income. Non-genetic within-sibling analysis supported an effect of BMI on socio-economic position (SEP); precision in within-sibling MR was too low to draw inference about effects of BMI on SEP. There was some evidence of pleiotropy, with MR Egger suggesting limited effects of BMI on deprivation, although precision of these estimates is also low. Non-linear MR suggested that low BMI (bottom three deciles, <23.5 kg/m2) reduces the odds of cohabiting with a partner or spouse in men, whereas high BMI (top two deciles, >30.7 kg/m2) reduces the odds of cohabitation in women. Both non-genetic and MR within-sibling analyses supported this sex-specific effect of BMI on cohabitation. In men only, higher BMI was related to lower participation in leisure and social activities. There was little evidence that BMI affects visits from friends and family or having someone to confide in. Conclusions BMI may affect social and socio-economic outcomes, with both high and low BMI being detrimental for SEP, although larger within-family MR studies may help to test the robustness of MR results in unrelated individuals. Triangulation of evidence across MR and within-family analyses supports evidence of a sex-specific effect of BMI on cohabitation.
Issue Date: 1-Aug-2020
Date of Acceptance: 1-Nov-2019
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/86826
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyz240
ISSN: 0300-5771
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Start Page: 1173
End Page: 1184
Journal / Book Title: International Journal of Epidemiology
Volume: 49
Issue: 4
Copyright Statement: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Sponsor/Funder: The Health Foundation
Funder's Grant Number: 809008
Keywords: Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Body mass index
obesity
socio-economic
cohabitation
social contact
siblings
Mendelian randomization
OBESITY
WEIGHT
STIGMA
BIAS
DISCRIMINATION
Body mass index
Mendelian randomization
cohabitation
obesity
siblings
social contact
socio-economic
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Body mass index
obesity
socio-economic
cohabitation
social contact
siblings
Mendelian randomization
OBESITY
WEIGHT
STIGMA
BIAS
DISCRIMINATION
0104 Statistics
1117 Public Health and Health Services
Epidemiology
Publication Status: Published
Online Publication Date: 2019-12-04
Appears in Collections:Imperial College Business School



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons