94
IRUS TotalDownloads
Altmetric
Combining pontryagin's principle and dynamic programming for linear and nonlinear systems
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
DP_PMP_TAC.pdf | Accepted version | 3.01 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Title: | Combining pontryagin's principle and dynamic programming for linear and nonlinear systems |
Authors: | Sassano, M Astolfi, A |
Item Type: | Journal Article |
Abstract: | To study optimal control and disturbance attenuation problems, two prominent-and somewhat alternative-strategies have emerged in the last century: dynamic programming (DP) and Pontryagin's minimum principle (PMP). The former characterizes the solution by shaping the dynamics in a closed loop (a priori unknown) via the selection of a feedback input, at the price, however, of the solution to (typically daunting) partial differential equations. The latter, instead, provides (extended) dynamics that must be satisfied by the optimal process, for which boundary conditions (a priori unknown) should be determined. The results discussed in this article combine the two approaches by matching the corresponding trajectories, i.e., combining the underlying sources of information: knowledge of the complete initial condition from DP and of the optimal dynamics from PMP. The proposed approach provides insights for linear as well as nonlinear systems. In the case of linear systems, the derived conditions lead to matrix algebraic equations, similar to the classic algebraic Riccati equations (AREs), although with coefficients defined as polynomial functions of the input gain matrix, with the property that the coefficient of the quadratic term of such equation is sign definite, even if the corresponding coefficient of the original ARE is sign indefinite, as it is typically the case in the H ∞ control problem. This feature is particularly appealing from the computational point of view, since it permits the use of standard minimization techniques for convex functions, such as the gradient algorithm. In the presence of nonlinear dynamics, the strategy leads to algebraic equations that allow us to (locally) construct the optimal feedback by considering the behavior of the closed-loop dynamics at a single point in the state space. |
Issue Date: | 1-Dec-2020 |
Date of Acceptance: | 29-Aug-2020 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/86608 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TAC.2020.3021385 |
ISSN: | 0018-9286 |
Publisher: | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers |
Start Page: | 5312 |
End Page: | 5327 |
Journal / Book Title: | IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control |
Volume: | 65 |
Issue: | 12 |
Copyright Statement: | © 2020 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works. |
Keywords: | Science & Technology Technology Automation & Control Systems Engineering, Electrical & Electronic Engineering Optimal control Partial differential equations Regulators Symmetric matrices Dynamic programming Attenuation Mathematical model Disturbance attenuation nonlinear control systems optimal control Riccati equations H-INFINITY-CONTROL MAXIMUM PRINCIPLE FEEDBACK EQUATION Science & Technology Technology Automation & Control Systems Engineering, Electrical & Electronic Engineering Optimal control Partial differential equations Regulators Symmetric matrices Dynamic programming Attenuation Mathematical model Disturbance attenuation nonlinear control systems optimal control Riccati equations H-INFINITY-CONTROL MAXIMUM PRINCIPLE FEEDBACK EQUATION Industrial Engineering & Automation 0102 Applied Mathematics 0906 Electrical and Electronic Engineering 0913 Mechanical Engineering |
Publication Status: | Published |
Online Publication Date: | 2020-09-03 |
Appears in Collections: | Electrical and Electronic Engineering |