6
IRUS Total
Downloads
  Altmetric

Gender issues in fundamental physics: Strumia's bibliometric analysis fails to account for key confounders and confuses correlation with causation

File Description SizeFormat 
qss_a_00117.pdfPublished version472.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Gender issues in fundamental physics: Strumia's bibliometric analysis fails to account for key confounders and confuses correlation with causation
Authors: Ball, P
Hengel, E
Moriarty, P
Oliver, R
Rippon, G
Britton, T
Saini, A
Wade, J
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Alessandro Strumia recently published a survey of gender differences in publications and citations in high-energy physics (HEP). In addition to providing full access to the data, code, and methodology, Strumia (2020) systematically describes and accounts for gender differences in HEP citation networks. His analysis points both to ongoing difficulties in attracting women to high-energy physics and an encouraging—though slow—trend in improvement.
Issue Date: 2021
Date of Acceptance: 25-Mar-2020
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/79036
DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00117
ISSN: 2641-3337
Publisher: MIT Press
Start Page: 1
End Page: 10
Journal / Book Title: Quantitative Science Studies
Volume: 2
Issue: 1
Copyright Statement: © 2021 Philip Ball, T. Benjamin Britton, Erin Hengel, Philip Moriarty, Rachel A. Oliver, Gina Rippon, Angela Saini, and Jessica Wade. Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
Sponsor/Funder: Royal Academy Of Engineering
Funder's Grant Number: RF/129
Keywords: physics.soc-ph
physics.soc-ph
cs.DL
cs.SI
Publication Status: Published
Online Publication Date: 2021
Appears in Collections:Materials
Faculty of Engineering



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons