275
IRUS Total
Downloads
  Altmetric

Environment, cancer and inequalities-The urgent need for prevention

File Description SizeFormat 
EJC paper-FINAL 0.1.docAccepted version185.5 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open
Title: Environment, cancer and inequalities-The urgent need for prevention
Authors: Vineis, P
Fecht, D
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: The proportion of total deaths attributable to environmental factors is estimated to be 23% of global deaths and 22% of global disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) according to one review. These estimates encompass all environmental agents including infectious agents but excluding behavioural factors. The authors of the review also estimated that 16% (95% CI: 7-41%) of cancer deaths are attributable to environmental risk factors (and 36% [95% CI: 17-52%] for lung cancer). In this article, we focus on the reasons why epidemiology is often unable to account for the whole burden of environmental carcinogens. The experience of air pollution is particularly instructive. While in the 1970s and early 1980s, air pollution was considered as a relatively marginal exposure in terms of attributable risks, the most recent estimate is that it accounts for 7.6% of global deaths and 4.2% of global DALYs world-wide (with East and South Asia accounting for 59% of the total). According to a review, ambient fine particulate matter air pollution contributed to 17.1% of ischaemic heart disease, 14.2% of cerebrovascular disease, 16.5% of lung cancer, 24.7% of low respiratory infections, and 27.1% of COPD mortality in 2015. Estimates for cancer as a whole are not available. The change in appreciation of the role of air pollution has been mainly due to the refinement of exposure assessment methods and the new generations of longitudinal studies. Mechanistic evidence via omic technologies is now rapidly increasing, thus lending credibility to previous epidemiological ('black box') associations. Much less is known about other environmental contaminants, some of which are widespread and pervasive, thus suggesting the need for the same rigourous methods as those applied to air pollution. Finally, a crucial issue remains inequality across different population groups, with uneven exposure to hazards and acquired susceptibilities due to multiple concomitant exposures and poorer health status.
Issue Date: 1-Nov-2018
Date of Acceptance: 11-Apr-2018
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/60713
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2018.04.018
ISSN: 0959-8049
Publisher: Elsevier
Start Page: 317
End Page: 326
Journal / Book Title: European Journal of Cancer
Volume: 103
Copyright Statement: © 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This manuscript is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Sponsor/Funder: Commission of the European Communities
Medical Research Council (MRC)
Funder's Grant Number: 633666
MR/L01341X/1
Keywords: Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Oncology
Environment
Cancer
Inequalities
Exposures
Multicausality
Exposome
Omics
AMBIENT AIR-POLLUTION
LUNG-CANCER
CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE
GLOBAL BURDEN
EXPOSURE
ASSOCIATION
METHYLATION
MORTALITY
SMOKING
HEALTH
Cancer
Environment
Exposome
Exposures
Inequalities
Multicausality
Omics
Environmental Exposure
Humans
Neoplasms
Socioeconomic Factors
Humans
Neoplasms
Environmental Exposure
Socioeconomic Factors
Cancer
Environment
Exposome
Exposures
Inequalities
Multicausality
Omics
Oncology & Carcinogenesis
1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Publication Status: Published
Conference Place: England
Online Publication Date: 2018-06-11
Appears in Collections:Grantham Institute for Climate Change
School of Public Health