74
IRUS Total
Downloads
  Altmetric

Where does the carbon go? A model-data intercomparison of vegetation carbon allocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment sites

Title: Where does the carbon go? A model-data intercomparison of vegetation carbon allocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment sites
Authors: De Kauwe, MG
Medlyn, BE
Zaehle, S
Walker, AP
Dietze, MC
Wang, Y-P
Luo, Y
Jain, AK
El-Masri, B
Hickler, T
Warlind, D
Weng, E
Parton, WJ
Thornton, PE
Wang, S
Prentice, IC
Asao, S
Smith, B
McCarthy, HR
Iversen, CM
Hanson, PJ
Warren, JM
Oren, R
Norby, RJ
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Elevated atmospheric CO 2 concentration (eCO 2 ) has the potential to increase vegetation carbon storage if increased net primary production causes increased long-lived biomass. Model predictions of eCO 2 effects on vegetation carbon storage depend on how allocation and turnover processes are represented. We used data from two temperate forest free-air CO 2 enrichment (FACE) experiments to evaluate representations of allocation and turnover in 11 ecosystem models. Observed eCO 2 effects on allocation were dynamic. Allocation schemes based on func- tional relationships among biomass fractions that vary with resource availability were best able to capture the general features of the observations. Allocation schemes based on constant fractions or resource limitations performed less well, with some models having unintended outcomes. Few models represent turnover processes mechanistically and there was wide vari- ation in predictions of tissue lifespan. Consequently, models did not perform well at predicting eCO 2 effects on vegetation carbon storage. Our recommendations to reduce uncertainty include: use of allocation schemes constrained by biomass fractions; careful testing of allocation schemes; and synthesis of allocation and turnover data in terms of model parameters. Data from intensively studied ecosystem manip- ulation experiments are invaluable for constraining models and we recommend that such experiments should attempt to fully quantify carbon, water and nutrient budgets.
Issue Date: 21-May-2014
Date of Acceptance: 8-Apr-2014
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/56727
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.12847
ISSN: 0028-646X
Publisher: WILEY-BLACKWELL
Start Page: 883
End Page: 899
Journal / Book Title: NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume: 203
Issue: 3
Copyright Statement: © 2014 The Authors New Phytologist © 2014 New Phytologist Trust. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Plant Sciences
allocation
carbon (C)
climate change
CO2 fertilisation
elevated CO2
free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)
models
phenology
ELEVATED ATMOSPHERIC CO2
FINE-ROOT PRODUCTION
CLIMATE-CHANGE
DECIDUOUS FOREST
NITROGEN UPTAKE
USE EFFICIENCY
SOIL CARBON
PINE FOREST
DYNAMICS
RESPONSES
Air
Biomass
Carbon
Carbon Dioxide
Computer Simulation
Ecosystem
Forests
Models, Theoretical
Trees
Wood
06 Biological Sciences
07 Agricultural And Veterinary Sciences
Plant Biology & Botany
Publication Status: Published
Appears in Collections:Department of Life Sciences
Grantham Institute for Climate Change
Faculty of Natural Sciences