96
IRUS Total
Downloads
  Altmetric

Melphalan 140mg/m2 or 200mg/m2 for autologous transplantation in myeloma: results from the Collaboration to Collect Autologous Transplant Outcomes in Lymphoma and Myeloma (CALM) study. A report by the EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party

File Description SizeFormat 
514.full.pdfPublished version1.79 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Melphalan 140mg/m2 or 200mg/m2 for autologous transplantation in myeloma: results from the Collaboration to Collect Autologous Transplant Outcomes in Lymphoma and Myeloma (CALM) study. A report by the EBMT Chronic Malignancies Working Party
Authors: Auner, HW
Iacobelli, S
Sbianchi, G
Knol-Bout, C
Blaise, D
Russell, NH
Apperley, JF
Pohlreich, D
Browne, P
Kobbe, G
Isaksson, C
Lenhoff, S
Scheid, C
Touzeau, C
Jantunen, E
Anagnostopoulos, A
Yakoub-Agha, I
Tanase, A
Schaap, N
Wiktor-Jedrzejczak, W
Krejci, M
Schönland, SO
Morris, C
Garderet, L
Kröger, N
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Melphalan at a dose of 200mg/m2 is standard conditioning prior to autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma, but a dose of 140mg/m2 is often used in clinical practice in patients perceived to be at risk of excess toxicity. To determine if melphalan 200 and melphalan 140 are equally effective and tolerable in clinically relevant patient subgroups we analysed 1964 first single autologous transplantation episodes using a series of Cox proportional-hazards models. Overall survival, progression-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, non-relapse mortality, haematopoietic recovery and second primary malignancy rates were not significantly different between the melphalan 140 (n=245) and melphalan 200 (n=1719) groups. Multivariable subgroup analysis showed that disease status at transplantation interacted with overall survival, progression-free survival, and cumulative incidence of relapse, with a significant advantage associated with melphalan 200 in patients transplanted in less than partial response (adjusted hazard ratios for melphalan 200 versus melphalan 140: 0.5, 0.54, and 0.56). In contrast, transplantation in very good partial or complete response significantly favoured melphalan 140 for overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.02). Age, renal function, prior proteasome inhibitor treatment, gender, or Karnofsky score did not interact with overall/progression-free survival or relapse rate in the melphalan dose groups. There were no significant survival or relapse rate differences between melphalan 200 and melphalan 140 patients with high-risk or standard-risk chromosomal abnormalities. In conclusion, remission status at the time of transplantation may favour melphalan 200 or melphalan 140 for key transplant outcomes (NCT01362972).
Issue Date: 7-Dec-2017
Date of Acceptance: 1-Dec-2017
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/55412
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2017.181339
ISSN: 0390-6078
Publisher: Ferrata Storti Foundation
Start Page: 514
End Page: 521
Journal / Book Title: Haematologica
Volume: 103
Issue: 3
Copyright Statement: Copyright© 2018 Ferrata Storti Foundation Material published in Haematologica is covered by copyright. All rights are reserved to the Ferrata Storti Foundation. Use of published material is allowed under the following terms and conditions:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode. Copies of published material are allowed for personal or internal use. Sharing published material for non-commercial purposes is subject to the following conditions: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode, sect. 3. Reproducing and sharing published material for commercial purposes is not allowed without permission in writing from the publisher.
Keywords: Melphalan
Multiple Myeloma
Stem Cell Transplantation
1102 Cardiovascular Medicine And Haematology
Immunology
Publication Status: Published
Appears in Collections:Department of Medicine (up to 2019)