1518
IRUS TotalDownloads
Altmetric
Are Public-Private Partnerships a Healthy Option? A Systematic Literature Review of “Constructive” Partnerships between Public and Private Actors
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PPPHealthSS&M.pdf | Accepted version | 1.21 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Title: | Are Public-Private Partnerships a Healthy Option? A Systematic Literature Review of “Constructive” Partnerships between Public and Private Actors |
Authors: | Roehrich, J Lewis, MK George, G |
Item Type: | Journal Article |
Abstract: | Governments around the world, but especially in Europe, have increasingly used private sector involvement in developing, financing and providing public health infrastructure and service delivery through public-private partnerships (PPPs). Although PPPs have attracted practitioner and academic interest over the last two decades, there has been no attempt to integrate the general management and health management literatures to provide a holistic view of PPPs in healthcare delivery. This study analyzes over 1,400 publications from a wide range of disciplines over a 20-year time period. We find that despite the scale and significance of the phenomenon, there is relatively limited conceptualization and in-depth empirical investigation. Based on bibliographic and content analyses, we synthesize formerly dispersed research perspectives into a comprehensive multi-dimensional framework of public-private partnerships. In so doing, we provide new directions for further research and practice. |
Issue Date: | 6-May-2014 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/13799 |
DOI: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.037 |
Journal / Book Title: | Social Science & Medicine |
Copyright Statement: | Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Social Science and Medicine. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, ONLINE (MAY 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.037 |
Appears in Collections: | Imperial College Business School |