Effect of renal artery revascularization upon cardiac structure and function in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: cardiac magnetic resonance sub-study of the ASTRAL trial
File(s)ASTRAL CMR Submission R1_Clean.docx (72.06 KB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac abnormalities are frequent in patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD). The Angioplasty and Stenting for Renal Artery Lesions (ASTRAL) trial studied the effect of percutaneous renal revascularization combined with medical therapy compared with medical therapy alone in 806 patients with ARVD. METHODS: This was a pre-specified sub-study of ASTRAL (clinical trials registration, current controlled trials number: ISRCTN59586944), designed to consider the effect of percutaneous renal artery angioplasty and stenting on change in cardiac structure and function, measured using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Fifty-one patients were recruited from six selected ASTRAL centres. Forty-four completed the study (medical therapy n = 21; revascularization n = 23). Full analysis of CMR was possible in 40 patients (18 medical therapy and 22 revascularization). CMR measurements of left and right ventricular end systolic (LV and RVESV) and diastolic volume (LV and RVEDV), ejection fraction (LVEF) and mass (LVM) were made shortly after recruitment and before revascularization in the interventional group, and again after 12 months. Reporting was performed by CMR analysts blinded to randomization arm. RESULTS: Groups were well matched for mean age (70 versus 72 years), blood pressure (148/71 versus 143/74 mmHg), degree of renal artery stenosis (75 versus 75%) and comorbid conditions. In both randomized groups, improvements in cardiac structural parameters were seen at 12 months, but there were no significant differences between treatment groups. Median left ventricular changes between baseline and 12 months (medical versus revascularization) were LVEDV -1.9 versus -5.8 mL, P = 0.4; LVESV -2.1 versus 0.3 mL, P = 0.7; LVM -5.4 versus -6.3 g, P = 0.8; and LVEF -1.5 versus -0.8%, P = 0.7. Multivariate regression also found that randomized treatment assignment was not associated with degree of change in any of the CMR measurements. CONCLUSIONS: In this sub-study of the ASTRAL trial, renal revascularization did not offer additional benefit to cardiac structure or function in unselected patients with ARVD.
Date Issued
2016-06-02
Date Acceptance
2016-04-09
Citation
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2016, 32 (6), pp.1006-1013
ISSN
1460-2385
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Start Page
1006
End Page
1013
Journal / Book Title
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Volume
32
Issue
6
Copyright Statement
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation following peer review. The version of record James Ritchie, Darren Green, Tina Chrysochou, Janet Hegarty, Kelly Handley, Natalie Ives, Keith Wheatley, Graeme Houston, Julian Wright, Ludwig Neyses, Nicholas Chalmers, Patrick Mark, Rajan Patel, Jon Moss, Giles Roditi, David Eadington, Elena Lukaschuk, John Cleland, and Philip A. Kalra Effect of renal artery revascularization upon cardiac structure and function in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: cardiac magnetic resonance sub-study of the ASTRAL trial Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. first published online June 2, 2016 doi:10.1093/ndt/gfw107 is available online at: http://ndt.oxfordjournals.org/citmgr?gca=ndt%3Bgfw107v1
Sponsor
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
National Institute for Health Research
Identifier
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27257278
PII: gfw107
Grant Number
N/A
N/A
Subjects
cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging
coronary artery disease
randomized controlled trial
renal artery stenosis
revascularization
Publication Status
Published