Altmetric

Uncertainty quantification in continuous fragmentation airburst models

File Description SizeFormat 
Icarus_Preprint_McMullan_Collins.pdfFile embargoed until 28 February 20201.28 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy
Title: Uncertainty quantification in continuous fragmentation airburst models
Authors: McMullan, S
Collins, GS
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: As evidenced by the Chelyabinsk and Tunguska airburst events in Russia, decameter-scale Near-Earth Objects (NEOs) can pose a hazard to human life and infrastructure from the energy they deposit in the atmosphere as they break up. To understand the potential damage these small NEOs can cause on Earth's surface, it is imperative to be able to model their atmospheric entry quickly and accurately. Here we compare three semi-analytical models of asteroid airbursts that differ in their descriptions of fragment separation and spreading. Each model can be calibrated to produce a good fit to the energy deposition curve inferred from Chelyabinsk observations, but in each case the implied initial meteoroid strength is different and when the calibrated models are upscaled to Tunguska, the results diverge. This introduces an inter-model uncertainty that compounds the large range of uncertain physical and model parameters that influence probabilistic hazard assessment. Uncertainty quantification of airburst energy deposition was performed for a theoretical impacting object with H-magnitude 27, assuming no prior knowledge of any other impactor or model parameter. Each of the three models produces a different distribution of airburst outcomes, however, the variation attributable to physical parameter uncertainty is far larger than the inter-model differences. To constrain the initial conditions of the Tunguska event, the same uncertainty quantification was performed for an H-magnitude 24 event. Among the scenarios consistent with Tunguska observations (5–10 km burst altitude, 10–60° trajectory angle, 3–50 MT TNT total energy release) the most likely range of impact conditions was: radius of 25–75 m, mass of 1× 10 8 – 2.5× 10 9 kg, initial velocity of 11.5–33 km/s, and angle of 25–60°.
Issue Date: 15-Jul-2019
Date of Acceptance: 12-Feb-2019
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/70252
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2019.02.013
ISSN: 0019-1035
Publisher: Elsevier
Start Page: 19
End Page: 35
Journal / Book Title: Icarus
Volume: 327
Copyright Statement: © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This manuscript is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Sponsor/Funder: Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
Funder's Grant Number: ST/S000615/1
Keywords: Science & Technology
Physical Sciences
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Near-Earth Objects
Airbursts
Numerical modelling
Uncertainty quantification
Tunguska
HYDRODYNAMIC CODE SOVA
SHOEMAKER-LEVY 9
LARGE METEOROIDS
TUNGUSKA
IMPACT
METEORITE
CHELYABINSK
FLOWS
EXPLOSION
RECOVERY
Astronomy & Astrophysics
0201 Astronomical and Space Sciences
0402 Geochemistry
0404 Geophysics
Publication Status: Published
Embargo Date: 2020-02-28
Online Publication Date: 2019-02-28
Appears in Collections:Earth Science and Engineering



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Creative Commonsx