Is the diagnostic radiological image an underutilised resource? Exploring the literature

File Description SizeFormat 
INII-REVISED-Manuscript.docxFile embargoed until 01 January 1000047.89 kBMicrosoft Word    Request a copy
INII-D-18-00090_R1.pdfFile embargoed until 01 January 100002.05 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy
INII-REVISED-Table1v2-SPIDER search terms.PNGFile embargoed until 01 January 1000045.7 kBimage/png    Request a copy
INII-Table 2 - Primary Benefit literature overview.JPGFile embargoed until 01 January 10000115.06 kBJPEG    Request a copy
INII-Table 3 - Secondary Benefit literature overview.JPGFile embargoed until 01 January 10000120.57 kBJPEG    Request a copy
INII-Figure 1-Adapted PRISMA diagram (2).JPGFile embargoed until 01 January 1000044.22 kBJPEG    Request a copy
INII-Figure 2-Literature map (2).pngFile embargoed until 01 January 10000271.18 kBimage/png    Request a copy
Title: Is the diagnostic radiological image an underutilised resource? Exploring the literature
Authors: Cox, W
Cavenagh, P
Bello, F
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: The number of diagnostic imaging examinations being undertaken in the UK is rising. Due to the expensive nature of producing these examinations, and the risks associated with exposing living tissue to the ionising radiation used by many of the imaging techniques, this growth comes with both a financial and a human cost. In a time of limited resources, it is important that we are able to maximise the benefits which we extract from these resources. Therefore, a broad search of the current literature was undertaken to assess our current understanding of the nature of benefit available from diagnostic radiological images. Two broad categories of benefit were identified: Primary benefit (n=470) and Secondary benefit (n=49). Primary benefits are those which are related to the justification for undertaking the imaging, e.g., abnormality detection, to assist in diagnosis or staging, or acting as an aid to clinical decision making, or intervention. Secondary benefits are those that are not related to the justification for imaging, e.g. to promote patient engagement and understanding or to facilitate communication. Existing work considering Primary benefits is comprehensive. Secondary benefit, however is less well recognised and may not be reliably realised. Use of the image to realise these benefits has far reaching potential. Particularly, there may be underexplored benefits which access to the images may provide to patients. This represents a gap in existing research which should be addressed.
Issue Date: 6-Feb-2019
Date of Acceptance: 30-Oct-2018
ISSN: 1869-4101
Publisher: Springer
Journal / Book Title: Insights into Imaging
Copyright Statement: This paper is embargoed until publication. Once published it will be available fully open access.
Sponsor/Funder: Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (E
Wellcome Trust
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
St Mary's Coronary Flow Trust
Imperial College Healthcare Charity
Funder's Grant Number: EP/F059221/1
RDOTH 79560
Publication Status: Accepted
Embargo Date: publication subject to indefinite embargo
Appears in Collections:Division of Surgery
Faculty of Medicine

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Creative Commonsx