Calibration concordance for astronomical instruments via multiplicative shrinkage

File Description SizeFormat 
18-jasa-calib.pdfFile embargoed until 10 December 20191.28 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy
Title: Calibration concordance for astronomical instruments via multiplicative shrinkage
Authors: Chen, Y
Meng, XL
Wang, X
Van Dyk, DA
Marshall, H
Kashyap, V
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Calibration data are often obtained by observing several well-understood objects simultaneously with multiple instruments, such as satellites for measuring astronomical sources. Analyzing such data and obtaining proper concordance among the instruments is challenging when the physical source models are not well understood, when there are uncertainties in “known” physical quantities, or when data quality varies in ways that cannot be fully quantified. Furthermore, the number of model parameters increases with both the number of instruments and the number of sources. Thus, concordance of the instruments requires careful modeling of the mean signals, the intrinsic source differences, and measurement errors. In this article, we propose a log-Normal model and a more general log-t model that respect the multiplicative nature of the mean signals via a half-variance adjustment, yet permit imperfections in the mean modeling to be absorbed by residual variances. We present analytical solutions in the form of power shrinkage in special cases and develop reliable Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for general cases, both of which are available in the Python module CalConcordance. We apply our method to several datasets including a combination of observations of active galactic nuclei (AGN) and spectral line emission from the supernova remnant E0102, obtained with a variety of X-ray telescopes such as Chandra, XMM- Newton, Suzaku, and Swift. The data are compiled by the International Astronomical Consortium for High Energy Calibration. We demonstrate that our method provides helpful and practical guidance for astrophysicists when adjusting for disagreements among instruments. Supplementary materials for this article, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work, are available as an online supplement.
Issue Date: 18-Mar-2019
Date of Acceptance: 21-Sep-2018
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/64676
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2018.1528978
ISSN: 0162-1459
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Start Page: 1018
End Page: 1037
Journal / Book Title: Journal of the American Statistical Association
Volume: 114
Issue: 527
Copyright Statement: © 2019 American Statistical Association. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the American Statistical Association on 18 March 2019, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2018.1528978
Sponsor/Funder: National Science Foundation (US)
European Commission
Funder's Grant Number: DMS 15-13484
H2020-MSCA-RISE-2015-691164
Keywords: Statistics & Probability
0104 Statistics
1403 Econometrics
1603 Demography
Publication Status: Published
Embargo Date: 2019-12-10
Online Publication Date: 2018-12-10
Appears in Collections:Mathematics
Statistics
Faculty of Natural Sciences



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Creative Commons