Altmetric

Vaginal dysbiosis increases risk of preterm fetal membrane rupture, neonatal sepsis and is exacerbated by erythromycin

File Description SizeFormat 
s12916-017-0999-x.pdfPublished version5.79 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Vaginal dysbiosis increases risk of preterm fetal membrane rupture, neonatal sepsis and is exacerbated by erythromycin
Authors: MacIntyre, DA
Brown, R
Marchesi, J
Lee, Y
Smith, A
Lehne, B
Kindinger, L
Terzidou, V
Holmes, E
Nicholson, J
Bennett, P
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Background: Preterm prelabour rupture of the fetal membranes (PPROM) precedes 30% of preterm births and is a risk factor for early onset neonatal sepsis. As PPROM is strongly associated with ascending vaginal infection prophylactic antibiotics are widely used. The evolution of vaginal microbiota composition associated with PPROM and the impact of antibiotics on bacterial composition is unknown. Methods: We prospectively assessed vaginal microbiota prior to and following PPROM using MiSeq-based sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons and examined the impact of erythromycin prophylaxis on bacterial load and community structures. Results: In contrast to pregnancies delivering at term, vaginal dysbiosis characterised by Lactobacillus spp. depletion, was present prior to the rupture of fetal membranes in approximately a third of cases (0% versus 27%, P= 0.026) and persisted following membrane rupture (31%, P= 0.005). Vaginal dysbiosis was exacerbated by erythromycin treatment (47%, P= 0.00009) particularly in women initially colonised by Lactobacillus species. Lactobacillus depletion and increased relative abundance of Sneathia spp. was associated with subsequent funisitis and early onset neonatal sepsis. Conclusions: Our data show that vaginal microbiota composition is a risk-factor for subsequent PPROM and is associated with adverse short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes. This highlights vaginal microbiota as a potentially modifiable antenatal risk factor for PPROM and suggests that routine use of erythromycin for PPROM be re-examined.
Issue Date: 24-Jan-2018
Date of Acceptance: 20-Dec-2017
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/55525
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0999-x
ISSN: 1741-7015
Publisher: BioMed Central
Journal / Book Title: BMC Medicine
Volume: 16
Copyright Statement: © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Sponsor/Funder: Medical Research Council (MRC)
Medical Research Council (MRC)
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust- BRC Funding
Funder's Grant Number: MR/L009226/1
MR/L009226/1
RDD03 79560
Keywords: 11 Medical And Health Sciences
General & Internal Medicine
Publication Status: Published
Article Number: 9
Appears in Collections:Division of Surgery
Faculty of Medicine
Epidemiology, Public Health and Primary Care



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Creative Commonsx