Citizen science for hydrological risk reduction and resilience building

File Description SizeFormat 
Paul_et_al-2018-Wiley_Interdisciplinary_Reviews__Water.pdfPublished version824.3 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Citizen science for hydrological risk reduction and resilience building
Authors: Paul, JD
Buytaert, W
Allen, S
Ballesteros-Cánovas, JA
Bhusal, J
Cieslik, K
Clark, J
Dugar, S
Hannah, DM
Stoffel, M
Dewulf, A
Dhital, MR
Liu, W
Nayaval, JL
Neupane, B
Schiller, A
Smith, PJ
Supper, R
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: In disaster risk management (DRM), an emerging shift has been noted from broad-scale, top-down assessments toward more participatory, community-based, bottom-up approaches. Arguably, nonscientist local stakeholders have always played an important role in knowledge risk management and resilience building within a hydrological context, such as flood response and drought alleviation. However, rapidly developing information and communication technologies such as the Internet, smartphones, and social media have already demonstrated their sizeable potential to make knowledge creation more multidirectional, decentralized, diverse, and inclusive. Combined with technologies for robust and low-cost sensor networks, a ‘citizen science’ approach has recently emerged as a promising direction in the provision of extensive, real-time information for risk management. Such projects work best when there is community buy-in, when their purpose(s) are clearly defined at the outset, and when the motivations and skillsets of all participants and stakeholders are well understood. They have great potential to enhance knowledge creation, not only for data collection, but also for analysis or interpretation. In addition, they can serve as a means of educating and empowering communities and stakeholders that are bypassed by more traditional knowledge generation processes. Here, we review the state-of-the-art of citizen science within the context of hydrological risk reduction and resilience building. Particularly when embedded within a polycentric approach toward risk governance, we argue that citizen science could complement more traditional knowledge generation practices, and also enhance innovation, adaptation, multidirectional information provision, risk management, and local resilience building.
Issue Date: 24-Oct-2017
Date of Acceptance: 22-Sep-2017
ISSN: 2049-1948
Publisher: Wiley
Journal / Book Title: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water
Volume: 5
Issue: 1
Copyright Statement: © 2017 The Authors.WIREs Waterpublished by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in anymedium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Sponsor/Funder: Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
Funder's Grant Number: NE/P000452/1
Keywords: Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Physical Sciences
Environmental Sciences
Water Resources
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
Publication Status: Published
Article Number: e1262
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Engineering
Civil and Environmental Engineering
Centre for Environmental Policy
Faculty of Natural Sciences

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Creative Commons