Spatial mapping of humeral head bone density

File Description SizeFormat 
JSES-D-16-00991R1.pdfAccepted version1.42 MBAdobe PDFDownload
1-s2.0-S1058274617301519-main.pdfPublished version1.29 MBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: Spatial mapping of humeral head bone density
Author(s): Alidousti, H
Giles, J
Emery, R
Jeffers, J
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Background: Short stem humeral replacements achieve fixation by anchoring to the metaphyseal trabecular bone. Fixing the implant in high density bone can provide strong fixation and reduce the risk of loosening. However, there is a lack of data mapping the bone density distribution in the proximal humerus. The aim of the study was to investigate the bone density in proximal humerus. Methods: Eight CT scans of healthy cadaveric humeri were used to map bone density distribution in the humeral head. The proximal humeral head was divided into twelve slices parallel to the humeral anatomical neck. Each slice was then divided into four concentric circles. The slices below the anatomical neck, where short stem implants have their fixation features, were further divided into radial sectors. The average bone density for each of these regions was calculated and regions of interest were compared using a repeated measures ANOVA with significance set at p<0.05. Results: Average apparent bone density was found to decrease from proximal to distal regions with the majority of higher bone density proximal to the anatomical neck of the humerus (p<0.05). Below the anatomical neck, bone density increases from central to peripheral regions where cortical bone eventually occupies the space (p<0.05). In distal slices below the anatomical neck, a higher bone density distribution in the medial calcar region was also observed. Conclusion: This study indicates that it is advantageous with respect to implant fixation to preserve some bone above the anatomical neck and epiphyseal plate, and to use the denser bone at the periphery.
Publication Date: 8-May-2017
Date of Acceptance: 1-Mar-2017
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/45412
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.006
ISSN: 1532-6500
Publisher: Elsevier
Start Page: 1653
End Page: 1661
Journal / Book Title: Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume: 26
Issue: 9
Sponsor/Funder: Wellcome Trust
Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC)
Funder's Grant Number: WT 098269/Z/12/Z
EP/K027549/1
Copyright Statement: © 2017 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Keywords: Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Orthopedics
Sport Sciences
Surgery
Shoulder arthroplasty
humeral bone density
short-stem devices
implant fixation
humeral component
implant design
implant loosening
MINERAL DENSITY
IMPLANT
FRACTURES
STABILITY
TISSUE
Shoulder arthroplasty
humeral bone density
humeral component
implant design
implant fixation
implant loosening
short-stem devices
1103 Clinical Sciences
Orthopedics
Publication Status: Published
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Division of Surgery
Faculty of Medicine



Items in Spiral are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Creative Commons