The ecosystem approach, ecosystem services and established forestry policy approaches in the United Kingdom

File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0264837716307645-main.pdfPublished version588.79 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: The ecosystem approach, ecosystem services and established forestry policy approaches in the United Kingdom
Author(s): Raum, S
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: A series of approaches have been proposed for natural resource management and biodiversity conservation in recent decades. In the important forestry sector, two of the most dominant policy paradigms have been multi-purpose forestry and sustainable forest management. The Convention on Biological Diversity, amongst other transnational commitments, added the ecosystem approach and its related idea of ecosystem services to this succession which is increasingly becoming the basis for natural resource management, including in the United Kingdom (UK). However, this latest addition raises the stimulating question of whether in forestry the ecosystem approach and the associated ecosystem services concept really constitute something fundamentally new, or are merely an extension or re-branding of existing policy approaches. This paper contributes to a lively contemporary debate surrounding the ecosystem approach and ecosystem services, by examining how these two interrelated but distinctly different concepts are currently understood and adopted within UK forestry and in the context of established forestry policy paradigms. For this purpose, I undertook a review of the scholarly literature and legal and policy documents which have been triangulated with a survey of the attitudes, interpretations and opinions of forestry stakeholders through expert interviews. The analysis suggests that in the UK forestry sector, as elsewhere, the frequency of, often broad and ambiguous approaches to natural resource management and biodiversity conservation in general, and forestry policy and management in particular, are causing confusion amongst some stakeholders, who, unsurprisingly frequently conflate concepts seemingly without understanding the details. However, a clear understanding of the differences and similarities of these important concepts, stemming from overlapping but different disciplines, is crucially important for successful policy implementation and sustainable forest management. This article attempts to contribute to such a clarification and to further interdisciplinary understanding.
Publication Date: 11-Mar-2017
Date of Acceptance: 23-Jan-2017
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/44195
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.030
ISSN: 1873-5754
Publisher: Elsevier
Start Page: 282
End Page: 291
Journal / Book Title: Land Use Policy
Volume: 64
Copyright Statement: © 2017 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Sponsor/Funder: Natural Environment Research Council [2006-2012]
Funder's Grant Number: NERC - DTC: NE/J500094/1
Keywords: Urban & Regional Planning
MD Multidisciplinary
Publication Status: Published
Appears in Collections:Centre for Environmental Policy
Faculty of Natural Sciences



Items in Spiral are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Creative Commons