Altmetric

A Patient-Centered Framework for Evaluating Digital Maturity of Health Services: A Systematic Review

File Description SizeFormat 
fc-xsltGalley-5047-79959-9-PB.pdfPublished version445.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: A Patient-Centered Framework for Evaluating Digital Maturity of Health Services: A Systematic Review
Authors: Flott, K
Callahan, R
Darzi, A
Mayer, E
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: © Kelsey Flott, Ryan Callahan, Ara Darzi, Erik Mayer.Background: Digital maturity is the extent to which digital technologies are used as enablers to deliver a high-quality health service. Extensive literature exists about how to assess the components of digital maturity, but it has not been used to design a comprehensive framework for evaluation. Consequently, the measurement systems that do exist are limited to evaluating digital programs within one service or care setting, meaning that digital maturity evaluation is not accounting for the needs of patients across their care pathways. Objective: The objective of our study was to identify the best methods and metrics for evaluating digital maturity and to create a novel, evidence-based tool for evaluating digital maturity across patient care pathways. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature to find the best methods and metrics for evaluating digital maturity. We searched the PubMed database for all papers relevant to digital maturity evaluation. Papers were selected if they provided insight into how to appraise digital systems within the health service and if they indicated the factors that constitute or facilitate digital maturity. Papers were analyzed to identify methodology for evaluating digital maturity and indicators of digitally mature systems. We then used the resulting information about methodology to design an evaluation framework. Following that, the indicators of digital maturity were extracted and grouped into increasing levels of maturity and operationalized as metrics within the evaluation framework. Results: We identified 28 papers as relevant to evaluating digital maturity, from which we derived 5 themes. The first theme concerned general evaluation methodology for constructing the framework (7 papers). The following 4 themes were the increasing levels of digital maturity: resources and ability (6 papers), usage (7 papers), interoperability (3 papers), and impact (5 papers). The framework includes metrics for each of these levels at each stage of the typical patient care pathway. Conclusions: The framework uses a patient-centric model that departs from traditional service-specific measurements and allows for novel insights into how digital programs benefit patients across the health system.
Issue Date: 14-Apr-2016
Date of Acceptance: 3-Dec-2015
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/34053
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5047
ISSN: 1439-4456
Publisher: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Journal / Book Title: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Volume: 18
Issue: 4
Copyright Statement: © Kelsey Flott, Ryan Callahan, Ara Darzi, Erik Mayer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited.
Sponsor/Funder: NHS England
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Funder's Grant Number: n/a
FIN16
Keywords: digital maturity
evaluation
health information exchange
patient-centered care
Medical Informatics
08 Information And Computing Sciences
11 Medical And Health Sciences
17 Psychology And Cognitive Sciences
Publication Status: Published
Article Number: e75
Appears in Collections:Division of Surgery



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Creative Commonsx