IRUS Total

Stable isotope fractionation of metals and metalloids in plants: a review

File Description SizeFormat 
Wiggenhauser & Moore et al. 2022.pdfPublished version3.49 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Stable isotope fractionation of metals and metalloids in plants: a review
Authors: Wiggenhauser, M
Moore, RET
Wang, P
Bienert, GP
Holst Laursen, K
Blotevogel, S
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: This work critically reviews stable isotope fractionation of essential (B, Mg, K, Ca, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Mo), beneficial (Si), and non-essential (Cd, Tl) metals and metalloids in plants. The review (i) provides basic principles and methodologies for non-traditional isotope analyses, (ii) compiles isotope fractionation for uptake and translocation for each element and connects them to physiological processes, and (iii) interlinks knowledge from different elements to identify common and contrasting drivers of isotope fractionation. Different biological and physico-chemical processes drive isotope fractionation in plants. During uptake, Ca and Mg fractionate through root apoplast adsorption, Si through diffusion during membrane passage, Fe and Cu through reduction prior to membrane transport in strategy I plants, and Zn, Cu, and Cd through membrane transport. During translocation and utilization, isotopes fractionate through precipitation into insoluble forms, such as phytoliths (Si) or oxalate (Ca), structural binding to cell walls (Ca), and membrane transport and binding to soluble organic ligands (Zn, Cd). These processes can lead to similar (Cu, Fe) and opposing (Ca vs. Mg, Zn vs. Cd) isotope fractionation patterns of chemically similar elements in plants. Isotope fractionation in plants is influenced by biotic factors, such as phenological stages and plant genetics, as well as abiotic factors. Different nutrient supply induced shifts in isotope fractionation patterns for Mg, Cu, and Zn, suggesting that isotope process tracing can be used as a tool to detect and quantify different uptake pathways in response to abiotic stresses. However, the interpretation of isotope fractionation in plants is challenging because many isotope fractionation factors associated with specific processes are unknown and experiments are often exploratory. To overcome these limitations, fundamental geochemical research should expand the database of isotope fractionation factors and disentangle kinetic and equilibrium fractionation. In addition, plant growth studies should further shift toward hypothesis-driven experiments, for example, by integrating contrasting nutrient supplies, using established model plants, genetic approaches, and by combining isotope analyses with complementary speciation techniques. To fully exploit the potential of isotope process tracing in plants, the interdisciplinary expertise of plant and isotope geochemical scientists is required.
Editors: Hanikenne, M
Issue Date: 19-Apr-2022
Date of Acceptance: 17-Feb-2022
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/96488
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.840941
ISSN: 1664-462X
Publisher: Frontiers Media
Journal / Book Title: Frontiers in Plant Science
Volume: 13
Copyright Statement: © 2022 Wiggenhauser, Moore, Wang, Bienert, Laursen and Blotevogel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Keywords: 0607 Plant Biology
Publication Status: Published
Article Number: ARTN 840941
Appears in Collections:Earth Science and Engineering

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons