22
IRUS Total
Downloads
  Altmetric

The clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of clozapine for inpatients with severe borderline personality disorder (CALMED study): A randomised placebo-controlled trial.

File Description SizeFormat 
20451253221090832.pdfPublished version689.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: The clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of clozapine for inpatients with severe borderline personality disorder (CALMED study): A randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Authors: Crawford, M
Leeson, V
Evans, R
Barrett, B
McQuaid, A
Cheshire, J
Sanatina, R
Lamph, G
Sen, P
Anagnostakis, K
Millard, L
Qurashi, I
Larkin, F
Husain, N
Moran, P
Barnes, T
Paton, C
Hoare, Z
Picchioni, M
Gibbon, S
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Background: Data from case series suggest that clozapine may benefit inpatients with borderline personality disorder (BPD), but randomised trials have not been conducted. Methods: Multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We aimed to recruit 222 inpatients with severe BPD aged 18 or over, who had failed to respond to other antipsychotic medications. We randomly allocated participants on a 1:1 ratio to receive up to 400mg of clozapine per day or an inert placebo using a remote web-based randomisation service. The primary outcome was total score on the Zanarini Rating scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD) at six months. Secondary outcomes included self-harm, aggression, resource use and costs, side effects and adverse events. We used a modified intention to treat analysis (mITT) restricted to those who took one or more dose of trial medication, using a general linear model fitted at six months adjusted for baseline score, allocation group and site. Results: The study closed early due to poor recruitment and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Of 29 study participants, 24 (83%) were followed up at six months, of whom 21 (72%) were included in the mITT analysis. At six months, 11 (73%) participants assigned to clozapine and 6 (43%) of those assigned to placebo were still taking trial medication. Adjusted difference in mean total ZAN-BPD score at six months was -3.86 (95% Confidence Intervals = -10.04 to 2.32, p=0.22). There were 14 serious adverse events; six in the clozapine arm and eight in the placebo arm of the trial. There was little difference in the cost of care between groups. Interpretation: We recruited insufficient participants to test the primary hypothesis. The study findings highlight problems in conducting placebo-controlled trials of clozapine and in using clozapine for people with BPD, outside specialist inpatient mental health units. Trial registration ISRCTN18352058. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN18352058
Issue Date: 29-Apr-2022
Date of Acceptance: 11-Mar-2022
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/96268
DOI: 10.1177/20451253221090832
ISSN: 2045-1253
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Start Page: 1
End Page: 14
Journal / Book Title: Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology
Volume: 12
Copyright Statement: © The Author(s), 2022. Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journalspermissions. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Sponsor/Funder: National Institute for Health Research
Funder's Grant Number: 16/157/02
Keywords: Borderline personality disorder
Clinical Trial
clozapine
Publication Status: Published
Online Publication Date: 2022-04-29
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine
Department of Brain Sciences



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons