22
IRUS TotalDownloads
Altmetric
The clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of clozapine for inpatients with severe borderline personality disorder (CALMED study): A randomised placebo-controlled trial.
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
20451253221090832.pdf | Published version | 689.79 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Title: | The clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of clozapine for inpatients with severe borderline personality disorder (CALMED study): A randomised placebo-controlled trial. |
Authors: | Crawford, M Leeson, V Evans, R Barrett, B McQuaid, A Cheshire, J Sanatina, R Lamph, G Sen, P Anagnostakis, K Millard, L Qurashi, I Larkin, F Husain, N Moran, P Barnes, T Paton, C Hoare, Z Picchioni, M Gibbon, S |
Item Type: | Journal Article |
Abstract: | Background: Data from case series suggest that clozapine may benefit inpatients with borderline personality disorder (BPD), but randomised trials have not been conducted. Methods: Multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We aimed to recruit 222 inpatients with severe BPD aged 18 or over, who had failed to respond to other antipsychotic medications. We randomly allocated participants on a 1:1 ratio to receive up to 400mg of clozapine per day or an inert placebo using a remote web-based randomisation service. The primary outcome was total score on the Zanarini Rating scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD) at six months. Secondary outcomes included self-harm, aggression, resource use and costs, side effects and adverse events. We used a modified intention to treat analysis (mITT) restricted to those who took one or more dose of trial medication, using a general linear model fitted at six months adjusted for baseline score, allocation group and site. Results: The study closed early due to poor recruitment and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Of 29 study participants, 24 (83%) were followed up at six months, of whom 21 (72%) were included in the mITT analysis. At six months, 11 (73%) participants assigned to clozapine and 6 (43%) of those assigned to placebo were still taking trial medication. Adjusted difference in mean total ZAN-BPD score at six months was -3.86 (95% Confidence Intervals = -10.04 to 2.32, p=0.22). There were 14 serious adverse events; six in the clozapine arm and eight in the placebo arm of the trial. There was little difference in the cost of care between groups. Interpretation: We recruited insufficient participants to test the primary hypothesis. The study findings highlight problems in conducting placebo-controlled trials of clozapine and in using clozapine for people with BPD, outside specialist inpatient mental health units. Trial registration ISRCTN18352058. https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN18352058 |
Issue Date: | 29-Apr-2022 |
Date of Acceptance: | 11-Mar-2022 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/96268 |
DOI: | 10.1177/20451253221090832 |
ISSN: | 2045-1253 |
Publisher: | SAGE Publications |
Start Page: | 1 |
End Page: | 14 |
Journal / Book Title: | Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology |
Volume: | 12 |
Copyright Statement: | © The Author(s), 2022. Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journalspermissions. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
Sponsor/Funder: | National Institute for Health Research |
Funder's Grant Number: | 16/157/02 |
Keywords: | Borderline personality disorder Clinical Trial clozapine |
Publication Status: | Published |
Online Publication Date: | 2022-04-29 |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Medicine Department of Brain Sciences |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License