20
IRUS Total
Downloads

Intangible Investment in the EU and US before and since the Great Recession and Its Contribution to Productivity Growth

File Description SizeFormat 
205-1372-3-PB.pdfPublished version1.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Intangible Investment in the EU and US before and since the Great Recession and Its Contribution to Productivity Growth
Authors: Haskel, J
Corrado, C
Jona-Lasinio, C
Iommi, M
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: This paper uses a new cross-country cross-industry dataset on investment in tangible and intangible assets for 18 European countries and the US. We set out a framework for measuring intangible investment and capital stocks and their effect on output, inputs and total factor productivity. The analysis provides evidence on the diffusion of intangible investment across Europe and the US over the years 2000-2013 and offers growth accounting evidence before and after the Great Recession in 2008-2009. Our major findings are the following. First, tangible investment fell massively during the Great Recession and has hardly recovered, whereas intangible investment has been relatively resilient and recovered fast in the US but lagged behind in the EU. Second, the sources of growth analysis including only national account intangibles (software, R&D, mineral exploration and artistic originals), suggest that capital deepening is the main driver of growth, with tangibles and intangibles accounting for 80% and 20% in the EU while both account for 50% in the US, over 2000-2013. Extending the asset boundary to the intangible assets not included in the national accounts (Corrado, Hulten and Sichel (2005)) makes capital deepening increase. The contribution of tangibles is reduced both in the EU and the US (60% and 40% respectively) while intangibles account for a larger share (40% in EU and 60% in the US). Then, our analysis shows that since the Great Recession, the slowdown in labour productivity growth has been driven by a decline in TFP growth with relatively a minor role for tangible and intangible capital. Finally, we document a significant correlation between stricter employment protection rules and less government investment in R&D, and a lower ratio of intangible to tangible investment.
Issue Date: 27-Feb-2018
Date of Acceptance: 1-Feb-2018
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/88328
DOI: 10.24294/jipd.v2i1.205.
ISSN: 2572-7923
Publisher: EnPress
Start Page: 11
End Page: 36
Journal / Book Title: Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development
Volume: 2
Issue: 1
Replaces: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/82862
10044/1/82862
Copyright Statement: © 2018 Carol Corrado, Jonathan Haskel, Cecilia Jona-Lasinio, Massimiliano Iommi. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Sponsor/Funder: Commission of the European Communities
Funder's Grant Number: 612774
Publication Status: Published
Appears in Collections:Imperial College Business School



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons