IRUS Total

Can they stomach it? Parent and practitioner acceptability of a trial comparing Gastric Residual Volume measurement versus no Gastric Residual Volume in UK NNU and PICU’s: a feasibility study

File Description SizeFormat 
s40814-021-00784-5.pdfPublished version626.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Can they stomach it? Parent and practitioner acceptability of a trial comparing Gastric Residual Volume measurement versus no Gastric Residual Volume in UK NNU and PICU’s: a feasibility study
Authors: Deja, E
Roper, L
Tume, L
Dorling, J
Gale, C
Arch, B
Latten, L
Pathan, N
Eccleson, H
Hickey, H
Preston, J
Beissel, A
Andrzejewska, I
Valla, F
Woolfall, K
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Background Routine measurement of gastric residual volume (GRV) to guide feeding in neonatal and paediatric intensive care is widespread. However, this practice is not evidence based and may cause harm. As part of a feasibility study, we explored parent and practitioner views on the acceptability of a trial comparing GRV measurement or no GRV measurement. Methods A mixed-methods study involving interviews and focus groups with practitioners and interviews with parents with experience of tube feeding in neonatal and/or paediatric intensive care. A voting system recorded closed question responses during practitioner data collection, enabling the collection of quantitative and qualitative data. Data were analysed using thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. Results We interviewed 31 parents and nine practitioners and ran five practitioner focus groups (n=42). Participants described how the research question was logical, and the intervention would not be invasive and potential benefits of not withholding the child’s feeds. However, both groups held concerns about the potential risk of not measuring GRV, including delayed diagnosis of infection and gut problems, increased risk of vomiting into lungs and causing discomfort or pain. Parent’s views on GRV measurement and consent decision making were influenced by their views on the importance of feeding in the ICU, their child’s prognosis and associated comorbidities or complications. Conclusions The majority of parents and practitioners viewed the proposed trial as acceptable. Potential concerns and preferences were identified that will need careful consideration to inform the development of the proposed trial protocol and staff training.
Issue Date: 16-Feb-2021
Date of Acceptance: 25-Jan-2021
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/87221
DOI: 10.1186/s40814-021-00784-5
ISSN: 2055-5784
Publisher: BioMed Central
Journal / Book Title: Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Volume: 7
Copyright Statement: © The Author(s). 2021. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you giveappropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate ifchanges were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commonslicence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commonslicence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtainpermission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to thedata made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Sponsor/Funder: Health Technology Assessment programme
Funder's Grant Number: 16/94/02
Publication Status: Published
Article Number: ARTN 49
Appears in Collections:School of Public Health

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons