Reduction in mobility and COVID-19 transmission
File(s)s41467-021-21358-2.pdf (1.75 MB) mobility_PNouvellet_NatCom_revision_SI.pdf (10.65 MB)
Published version
Supporting information
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, countries have sought to control SARS-CoV-2 transmission by restricting population movement through social distancing interventions, thus reducing the number of contacts.
Mobility data represent an important proxy measure of social distancing, and here, we characterise the relationship between transmission and mobility for 52 countries around the world.
Transmission significantly decreased with the initial reduction in mobility in 73% of the countries analysed, but we found evidence of decoupling of transmission and mobility following the relaxation of strict control measures for 80% of countries. For the majority of countries, mobility explained a substantial proportion of the variation in transmissibility (median adjusted R-squared: 48%, interquartile range - IQR - across countries [27-77%]). Where a change in the relationship occurred, predictive ability decreased after the relaxation; from a median adjusted R-squared of 74% (IQR across countries [49-91%]) pre-relaxation, to a median adjusted R-squared of 30% (IQR across countries [12-48%]) post-relaxation.
In countries with a clear relationship between mobility and transmission both before and after strict control measures were relaxed, mobility was associated with lower transmission rates after control measures were relaxed indicating that the beneficial effects of ongoing social distancing behaviours were substantial.
Mobility data represent an important proxy measure of social distancing, and here, we characterise the relationship between transmission and mobility for 52 countries around the world.
Transmission significantly decreased with the initial reduction in mobility in 73% of the countries analysed, but we found evidence of decoupling of transmission and mobility following the relaxation of strict control measures for 80% of countries. For the majority of countries, mobility explained a substantial proportion of the variation in transmissibility (median adjusted R-squared: 48%, interquartile range - IQR - across countries [27-77%]). Where a change in the relationship occurred, predictive ability decreased after the relaxation; from a median adjusted R-squared of 74% (IQR across countries [49-91%]) pre-relaxation, to a median adjusted R-squared of 30% (IQR across countries [12-48%]) post-relaxation.
In countries with a clear relationship between mobility and transmission both before and after strict control measures were relaxed, mobility was associated with lower transmission rates after control measures were relaxed indicating that the beneficial effects of ongoing social distancing behaviours were substantial.
Date Issued
2021-02-17
Date Acceptance
2021-01-12
Citation
Nature Communications, 2021, 12
ISSN
2041-1723
Publisher
Nature Research
Journal / Book Title
Nature Communications
Volume
12
Sponsor
Medical Research Council (MRC)
Medical Research Council (MRC)
National Institute for Health Research
International Society for Infectious Diseases
Medical Research Council
Wellcome Trust
Medical Research Council
Abdul Latif Jameel Foundation
Grant Number
MR/R015600/1
EP/V520354/1
NIHR200908
SBFF-2019-37324
MR/R015600/1
213494/Z/18/Z
MR/R015600/1
Subjects
Algorithms
COVID-19
Communicable Disease Control
Global Health
Humans
Models, Theoretical
Pandemics
Physical Distancing
Quarantine
SARS-CoV-2
Humans
Communicable Disease Control
Quarantine
Algorithms
Models, Theoretical
Pandemics
Global Health
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
Physical Distancing
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
ARTN 1090