70
IRUS TotalDownloads
Altmetric
Reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism following superficial endovenous treatment: a UK and Republic of Ireland consensus study
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Manuscript Final version.doc | Accepted version | 617.5 kB | Microsoft Word | View/Open |
Title: | Reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism following superficial endovenous treatment: a UK and Republic of Ireland consensus study |
Authors: | Dattani, N Shalhoub, J Nandhra, S Lane, T Abu-Own, A Elbasty, A Jones, A Duncan, A Garnham, A Thapar, A Murray, A Baig, A Saratzis, A Sharif, A Huasen, B Dawkins, C Nesbitt, C Carradice, D Morrow, D Bosanquet, D Kavanagh, E Shaikh, F Gosi, G Ambler, G Fulton, G Singh, G Travers, H Moore, H Olivier, J Hitchman, L O'Donohoe, M Popplewell, M Medani, M Jenkins, M Goh, MA Lyons, O McBride, O Moxey, P Stather, P Burns, P Forsythe, R Sam, R Brar, R Brightwell, R Benson, R Onida, S Paravastu, S Lambracos, S Vallabhaneni, SR Walsh, S Aktar, T Moloney, T Mzimba, Z Nyamekye, I |
Item Type: | Journal Article |
Abstract: | Objectives Venous thromboembolism is a potentially fatal complication of superficial endovenous treatment. Proper risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis could mitigate this hazard; however, there are currently no evidence-based or consensus guidelines. This study surveyed UK and Republic of Ireland vascular consultants to determine areas of consensus. Methods A 32-item survey was sent to vascular consultants via the Vascular and Endovascular Research Network (phase 1). These results generated 10 consensus statements which were redistributed (phase 2). ‘Good’ and ‘very good’ consensus were defined as endorsement/rejection of statements by >67% and >85% of respondents, respectively. Results Forty-two consultants completed phase 1. This generated seven statements regarding risk factors mandating peri-procedural pharmacoprophylaxis and three statements regarding specific pharmacoprophylaxis regimes. Forty-seven consultants completed phase 2. Regarding venous thromboembolism risk factors mandating pharmacoprophylaxis, ‘good’ and ‘very good’ consensus was achieved for 5/7 and 2/7 statements, respectively. Regarding specific regimens, ‘very good’ consensus was achieved for 3/3 statements. Conclusions The main findings from this study were that there was ‘good’ or ‘very good’ consensus that patients with any of the seven surveyed risk factors should be given pharmacoprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin. High-risk patients should receive one to two weeks of pharmacoprophylaxis rather than a single dose. |
Issue Date: | 1-Oct-2020 |
Date of Acceptance: | 5-Jun-2020 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/80880 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0268355520936420 |
ISSN: | 0268-3555 |
Publisher: | SAGE Publications |
Start Page: | 706 |
End Page: | 714 |
Journal / Book Title: | Phlebology |
Volume: | 35 |
Issue: | 9 |
Copyright Statement: | ©The Author(s) 2020. The final, definitive version of this paper has been published in Phlebology by Sage Publications Ltd. All rights reserved. It is available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0268355520936420 |
Keywords: | Science & Technology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Surgery Peripheral Vascular Disease Cardiovascular System & Cardiology Deep vein thrombosis varicose veins venous thromboembolism VTE management GREAT SAPHENOUS-VEIN ABLATION COMPRESSION THROMBOSIS REFERRALS Deep vein thrombosis VTE management varicose veins venous thromboembolism Cardiovascular System & Hematology 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology |
Publication Status: | Published |
Online Publication Date: | 2020-07-01 |
Appears in Collections: | Department of Surgery and Cancer Faculty of Medicine |