Altmetric

A modified Delphi study to identify the features of high quality measurement plans for healthcare improvement projects

File Description SizeFormat 
AModifiedDelphiStudyToIdentify.pdfPublished version896.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: A modified Delphi study to identify the features of high quality measurement plans for healthcare improvement projects
Authors: Woodcock, T
Adeleke, Y
Goeschel, C
Pronovost, P
Dixon-Woods, M
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Background The design and execution of measurement in quality improvement (QI) initiatives is often poor. Better guidance on “what good looks like” might help to mitigate some of the problems. We report a consensus-building process that sought to identify which features are important to include in QI measurement plans. Methods We conducted a three-stage consensus-building approach: (1) identifying the list of features of measurement plans that were potential candidates for inclusion based on literature review and the study team’s experience; (2) a two-round modified Delphi exercise with a panel of experts to establish consensus on the importance of these features; and (3) a small in-person consensus group meeting to finalise the list of features. Results A list of 104 candidate questions was generated. A panel of 19 experts in the Delphi reviewed these questions and produced consensus on retaining 46 questions in the first round and on a further 22 in the second round. Thematic analysis of open text responses from the panellists suggested a number of areas of debate that were explicitly considered by the consensus group. The exercise yielded 74 questions (71% of 104) on which there was consensus in five categories of measurement relating to: design, data collection and management, analysis, action, and embedding. Conclusions This study offers a consensus-based view on the features of a good measurement plan for a QI project in healthcare. The results may be of use to QI teams, funders and evaluators, but are likely to require further development and testing to ensure feasibility and usefulness. Key words: Measurement; Quality improvement; Quality measurement; Delphi technique.
Issue Date: 14-Jan-2020
Date of Acceptance: 13-Dec-2019
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/75663
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0886-6
ISSN: 1471-2288
Publisher: BioMed Central
Journal / Book Title: BMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume: 20
Issue: 1
Copyright Statement: © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Sponsor/Funder: The Health Foundation
The Health Foundation
The Health Foundation
Funder's Grant Number: 7343
7768
7174
Keywords: Delphi technique
Measurement
Quality improvement
Quality measurement
Measurement
Quality Improvement
Quality measurement
Delphi Technique
General & Internal Medicine
1117 Public Health and Health Services
Publication Status: Published
Open Access location: https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-019-0886-6??utm_source=other_website&utm_medium=cpm&utm_content=leaderboard&utm_campaign=BSCN_2_DD_X-molfeed_BMCSF
Article Number: 8
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine
Epidemiology, Public Health and Primary Care



Items in Spiral are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Creative Commons