238
IRUS TotalDownloads
Altmetric
A comparison of the healthiness of packaged foods and beverages from 12 countries using the Health Star Rating nutrient profiling system, 2013-2018
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
A comparison of the healthiness of packaged foods and beverages from 12 countries.pdf | Accepted version | 739.2 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Title: | A comparison of the healthiness of packaged foods and beverages from 12 countries using the Health Star Rating nutrient profiling system, 2013-2018 |
Authors: | Dunford, EK Ni Mhurchu, C Huang, L Vandevijvere, S Swinburn, B Pravst, I Tolentino-Mayo, L Reyes, M L'Abbe, M Neal, BC |
Item Type: | Journal Article |
Abstract: | We compared the healthiness of packaged foods and beverages between selected countries using the Health Star Rating (HSR) nutrient profiling system. Packaged food and beverage data collected 2013-2018 were obtained for Australia, Canada, Chile, China, India, Hong Kong, Mexico, New Zealand, Slovenia, South Africa, the UK, and USA. Each product was assigned to a food or beverage category and mean HSR was calculated overall by category and by country. Median energy density (kJ/100 g), saturated fat (g/100 g), total sugars (g/100 g) and sodium (mg/100 g) contents were calculated. Countries were ranked by mean HSR and median nutrient levels. Mean HSR for all products (n = 394,815) was 2.73 (SD 1.38) out of 5.0 (healthiest profile). The UK, USA, Australia and Canada ranked highest for overall nutrient profile (HSR 2.74-2.83) and India, Hong Kong, China and Chile ranked lowest (HSR 2.27-2.44). Countries with higher overall HSR generally ranked better with respect to nutrient levels. India ranked consistently in the least healthy third for all measures. There is considerable variability in the healthiness of packaged foods and beverages in different countries. The finding that packaged foods and beverages are less healthy in middle-income countries such as China and India suggests that nutrient profiling is an important tool to enable policymakers and industry actors to reformulate products available in the marketplace to reduce the risk of obesity and NCDs among populations. |
Issue Date: | Nov-2019 |
Date of Acceptance: | 15-Apr-2019 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/73288 |
DOI: | 10.1111/obr.12879 |
ISSN: | 1467-7881 |
Publisher: | Wiley |
Start Page: | 107 |
End Page: | 115 |
Journal / Book Title: | Obesity Reviews |
Volume: | 20 |
Issue: | S2 |
Copyright Statement: | © 2019 World Obesity Federation. This is the accepted version of the following article: Dunford, EK, Ni Mhurchu, C, Huang, L, et al. A comparison of the healthiness of packaged foods and beverages from 12 countries using the Health Star Rating nutrient profiling system, 2013–2018. Obesity Reviews. 2019; 20( S2): 107– 115, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12879 |
Keywords: | food labelling health star rating nutrient profiling packaged food food labelling health star rating nutrient profiling packaged food Endocrinology & Metabolism 11 Medical and Health Sciences 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences |
Publication Status: | Published |
Conference Place: | England |
Online Publication Date: | 2019-07-22 |
Appears in Collections: | School of Public Health |