16
IRUS TotalDownloads
A novel patient-specific instrument design can deliver robotic level accuracy in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | Accepted version | 987.15 kB | Microsoft Word | View/Open |
Title: | A novel patient-specific instrument design can deliver robotic level accuracy in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty |
Authors: | Jones, G Clarke, S Harris, S Jaere, M Thunayan, A De Klee, P Cobb, J |
Item Type: | Journal Article |
Abstract: | Background A previous randomised controlled trial (RCT) by our group found that robotic assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) surgery was significantly more accurate than conventional instrumentation. The aim of this study was to determine whether a low-cost novel PSI design could deliver the same level of accuracy as the robot in the same time efficient manner as conventional instruments. Methods Thirty patients undergoing medial UKA took part. Tibial component position was planned using a low dose CT-scan, and compared to a day 1 postoperative CT-scan to determine the difference between the planned and achieved positions. Operations were performed by one expert surgeon using PSI (Embody, London, UK). Results The mean absolute difference between planned and achieved tibial implant positions using PSI was 2.0° (SD 1.0°) in the coronal plane, 1.8° (SD 1.5) in the sagittal plane, and 4.5° (SD 3.3) in the axial plane. These results were not significantly different to the 13 historical robotic cases (mean difference 0.5°, 0.5°, and 1.7°, p = 0.1907, 0.2867 and 0.1049 respectively). PSI mean operating time was on average 62 min shorter than the robotic group (p < 0.0001) and 40 min shorter than the conventional instrument group (p < 0.0001). No complications were reported. Conclusions In conclusion, this clinical trial demonstrates that for tibial component positioning in UKA, a novel design PSI guide in the hands of an expert surgeon, can safely deliver comparable accuracy to a robotic system, whilst being significantly faster than conventional instruments. NIHR Clinical Research Network Reference: 16100. |
Issue Date: | Dec-2019 |
Date of Acceptance: | 1-Aug-2019 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/72739 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.knee.2019.08.001 |
ISSN: | 0968-0160 |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Start Page: | 1421 |
End Page: | 1428 |
Journal / Book Title: | The Knee |
Volume: | 26 |
Issue: | 6 |
Copyright Statement: | © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This manuscript is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
Keywords: | Science & Technology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Orthopedics Sport Sciences Surgery Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Partial knee replacement Patient specific instrumentation PSI Robotic surgery Robot-assisted surgery TIBIAL COMPONENT REPLACEMENT ALIGNMENT VARUS PSI Partial knee replacement Patient specific instrumentation Robot-assisted surgery Robotic surgery Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Aged Aged, 80 and over Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee Female Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional Knee Joint Knee Prosthesis Male Middle Aged Operative Time Prospective Studies Surgery, Computer-Assisted Tomography, X-Ray Computed Knee Joint Humans Tomography, X-Ray Computed Imaging, Three-Dimensional Surgery, Computer-Assisted Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee Prospective Studies Knee Prosthesis Aged Aged, 80 and over Middle Aged Female Male Operative Time unicompartmental knee arthroplasty partial knee replacement patient specific instrumentation PSI robotic surgery robot-assisted surgery Orthopedics 0903 Biomedical Engineering 1103 Clinical Sciences 1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences |
Publication Status: | Published |
Online Publication Date: | 2019-09-10 |
Appears in Collections: | Department of Surgery and Cancer |