16
IRUS Total
Downloads

A novel patient-specific instrument design can deliver robotic level accuracy in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

File Description SizeFormat 
UKA PSI v Robot Revised V3 - revisions accepted.docxAccepted version987.15 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open
Title: A novel patient-specific instrument design can deliver robotic level accuracy in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Authors: Jones, G
Clarke, S
Harris, S
Jaere, M
Thunayan, A
De Klee, P
Cobb, J
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Background A previous randomised controlled trial (RCT) by our group found that robotic assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) surgery was significantly more accurate than conventional instrumentation. The aim of this study was to determine whether a low-cost novel PSI design could deliver the same level of accuracy as the robot in the same time efficient manner as conventional instruments. Methods Thirty patients undergoing medial UKA took part. Tibial component position was planned using a low dose CT-scan, and compared to a day 1 postoperative CT-scan to determine the difference between the planned and achieved positions. Operations were performed by one expert surgeon using PSI (Embody, London, UK). Results The mean absolute difference between planned and achieved tibial implant positions using PSI was 2.0° (SD 1.0°) in the coronal plane, 1.8° (SD 1.5) in the sagittal plane, and 4.5° (SD 3.3) in the axial plane. These results were not significantly different to the 13 historical robotic cases (mean difference 0.5°, 0.5°, and 1.7°, p = 0.1907, 0.2867 and 0.1049 respectively). PSI mean operating time was on average 62 min shorter than the robotic group (p < 0.0001) and 40 min shorter than the conventional instrument group (p < 0.0001). No complications were reported. Conclusions In conclusion, this clinical trial demonstrates that for tibial component positioning in UKA, a novel design PSI guide in the hands of an expert surgeon, can safely deliver comparable accuracy to a robotic system, whilst being significantly faster than conventional instruments. NIHR Clinical Research Network Reference: 16100.
Issue Date: Dec-2019
Date of Acceptance: 1-Aug-2019
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/72739
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.08.001
ISSN: 0968-0160
Publisher: Elsevier
Start Page: 1421
End Page: 1428
Journal / Book Title: The Knee
Volume: 26
Issue: 6
Copyright Statement: © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This manuscript is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Keywords: Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Orthopedics
Sport Sciences
Surgery
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Partial knee replacement
Patient specific instrumentation
PSI
Robotic surgery
Robot-assisted surgery
TIBIAL COMPONENT
REPLACEMENT
ALIGNMENT
VARUS
PSI
Partial knee replacement
Patient specific instrumentation
Robot-assisted surgery
Robotic surgery
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Female
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Knee Joint
Knee Prosthesis
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Prospective Studies
Surgery, Computer-Assisted
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Knee Joint
Humans
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Surgery, Computer-Assisted
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Prospective Studies
Knee Prosthesis
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Middle Aged
Female
Male
Operative Time
unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
partial knee replacement
patient specific instrumentation
PSI
robotic surgery
robot-assisted surgery
Orthopedics
0903 Biomedical Engineering
1103 Clinical Sciences
1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences
Publication Status: Published
Online Publication Date: 2019-09-10
Appears in Collections:Department of Surgery and Cancer