74
IRUS Total
Downloads

Gastric residual volume measurement in U.K. PICUs: a survey of practice

File Description SizeFormat 
Gastric Residual Volume measurement PCCM word version final accepted.pdfAccepted version261.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Gastric residual volume measurement in U.K. PICUs: a survey of practice
Authors: Tume, LN
Arch, B
Woolfall, K
Latten, L
Deja, E
Roper, L
Pathan, N
Eccleson, H
Hickey, H
Brown, M
Beissel, A
Andrzejewska, I
Gale, C
Valla, FV
Dorling, J
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Objectives: Despite little evidence, the practice of routine measurement of gastric residual volume to guide both the initiation and delivery of enteral feeding in PICUs is widespread internationally. In light of increased scrutiny of the evidence surrounding this practice, and as part of a trial feasibility study, we aimed to determine enteral feeding and gastric residual volume measurement practices in U.K. PICUs. Design: An online survey to 27 U.K. PICUs. Setting: U.K. PICUs. Subjects: A clinical nurse, senior doctor, and dietician were invited to collaboratively complete one survey per PICU and send a copy of their unit guidelines on enteral feeding and gastric residual volume. Interventions: None. Measurement and Main Results: Twenty-four of 27 units (89%) approached completed the survey. Twenty-three units (95.8%; 23/24) had written feeding guidelines, and 19 units (19/23; 83%) sent their guidelines for review. More units fed continuously (15/24; 62%) than intermittently (9/24; 37%) via the gastric route as their primary feeding method. All but one PICU routinely measured gastric residual volume, regardless of the method of feeding. Eighteen units had an agreed definition of feed tolerance, and all these included gastric residual volume. Gastric residual volume thresholds for feed tolerance were either volume based (mL/kg body weight) (11/21; 52%) or a percentage of the volume of feed administered (6/21; 29%). Yet only a third of units provided guidance about the technique of gastric residual volume measurement. Conclusions: Routine gastric residual volume measurement is part of standard practice in U.K. PICUs, with little guidance provided about the technique which may impact the accuracy of gastric residual volume. All PICUs that defined feed tolerance included gastric residual volume in the definition. This is important to know when proposing a standard practice arm of any future trial of no-routine gastric residual volume measurement in critically ill children.
Issue Date: 1-Aug-2019
Date of Acceptance: 13-Feb-2019
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/69842
DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000001944
ISSN: 1529-7535
Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Start Page: 707
End Page: 713
Journal / Book Title: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Volume: 20
Issue: 8
Copyright Statement: © 2019, The Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies
Sponsor/Funder: Health Technology Assessment programme
Funder's Grant Number: 16/94/02
Keywords: Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Critical Care Medicine
Pediatrics
General & Internal Medicine
children
enteral feeding
intensive care
neonates
nutrition
ROUTINE EVALUATION
ENTERAL NUTRITION
IMPACT
1110 Nursing
1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine
Pediatrics
Publication Status: Published
Online Publication Date: 2019-04-04
Appears in Collections:School of Public Health