21
IRUS TotalDownloads
Altmetric
His resynchronization versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
3112.full (1).pdf | Published version | 1.57 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Title: | His resynchronization versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block |
Authors: | Arnold, A Shun-Shin, M Keene, D Howard, J Sohaib, S Wright, I Cole, G Qureshi, N Lefroy, D Koa-Wing, M Linton, N Lim, P Peters, N Davies, D Muthumala, A Tanner, M Ellenbogen, K Kanagaratnam, P Francis, D Whinnett, Z |
Item Type: | Journal Article |
Abstract: | Background His bundle pacing is a new method for delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Objectives The authors performed a head-to-head, high-precision, acute crossover comparison between His bundle pacing and conventional biventricular CRT, measuring effects on ventricular activation and acute hemodynamic function. Methods Patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block referred for conventional biventricular CRT were recruited. Using noninvasive epicardial electrocardiographic imaging, the authors identified patients in whom His bundle pacing shortened left ventricular activation time. In these patients, the authors compared the hemodynamic effects of His bundle pacing against biventricular pacing using a high-multiple repeated alternation protocol to minimize the effect of noise, as well as comparing effects on ventricular activation. Results In 18 of 23 patients, left ventricular activation time was significantly shortened by His bundle pacing. Seventeen patients had a complete electromechanical dataset. In them, His bundle pacing was more effective at delivering ventricular resynchronization than biventricular pacing: greater reduction in QRS duration (−18.6 ms; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −31.6 to −5.7 ms; p = 0.007), left ventricular activation time (−26 ms; 95% CI: −41 to −21 ms; p = 0.002), and left ventricular dyssynchrony index (−11.2 ms; 95% CI: −16.8 to −5.6 ms; p < 0.001). His bundle pacing also produced a greater acute hemodynamic response (4.6 mm Hg; 95% CI: 0.2 to 9.1 mm Hg; p = 0.04). The incremental activation time reduction with His bundle pacing over biventricular pacing correlated with the incremental hemodynamic improvement with His bundle pacing over biventricular pacing (R = 0.70; p = 0.04). Conclusions His resynchronization delivers better ventricular resynchronization, and greater improvement in hemodynamic parameters, than biventricular pacing. |
Date of Acceptance: | 13-Sep-2018 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/65049 |
DOI: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.073 |
ISSN: | 0735-1097 |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Start Page: | 3112 |
End Page: | 3122 |
Journal / Book Title: | Journal of the American College of Cardiology |
Volume: | 72 |
Issue: | 24 |
Replaces: | http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/65039 10044/1/65039 |
Copyright Statement: | © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
Sponsor/Funder: | British Heart Foundation Foundation for Circulatory Health Wellcome Trust |
Funder's Grant Number: | FS/13/44/30291 ICCH/12/5039 PS3162_WHCP |
Keywords: | 1102 Cardiovascular Medicine And Haematology 1117 Public Health And Health Services Cardiovascular System & Hematology |
Publication Status: | Published |
Online Publication Date: | 2018-12-10 |
Appears in Collections: | National Heart and Lung Institute |