101
IRUS TotalDownloads
Altmetric
Fluxgate magnetometer offset vector determination by the 3D mirror mode method
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
plaschke_et_al_MNRAS_2017b.pdf | Published version | 4.48 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Title: | Fluxgate magnetometer offset vector determination by the 3D mirror mode method |
Authors: | Plaschke, F Goetz, C Volwerk, M Richter, I Fruehauff, D Narita, Y Glassmeier, K-H Dougherty, MK |
Item Type: | Journal Article |
Abstract: | Fluxgate magnetometers on-board spacecraft need to be regularly calibrated in flight. In low fields, the most important calibration parameters are the three offset vector components, which represent the magnetometer measurements in vanishing ambient magnetic fields. In case of three-axis stabilized spacecraft, a few methods exist to determine offsets: (i) by analysis of Alfvénic fluctuations present in the pristine interplanetary magnetic field, (ii) by rolling the spacecraft around at least two axes, (iii) by cross-calibration against measurements from electron drift instruments or absolute magnetometers, and (iv) by taking measurements in regions of well-known magnetic fields, e.g. cometary diamagnetic cavities. In this paper, we introduce a fifth option, the 3-dimensional (3D) mirror mode method, by which 3D offset vectors can be determined using magnetic field measurements of highly compressional waves, e.g. mirror modes in the Earth’s magnetosheath. We test the method by applying it to magnetic field data measured by the following: the Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms-C spacecraft in the terrestrial magnetosheath, the Cassini spacecraft in the Jovian magnetosheath and the Rosetta spacecraft in the vicinity of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko. The tests reveal that the achievable offset accuracies depend on the ambient magnetic field strength (lower strength meaning higher accuracy), on the length of the underlying data interval (more data meaning higher accuracy) and on the stability of the offset that is to be determined. |
Issue Date: | 1-Jul-2017 |
Date of Acceptance: | 26-Sep-2017 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/64147 |
DOI: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2532 |
ISSN: | 0035-8711 |
Publisher: | Oxford University Press (OUP) |
Start Page: | S675 |
End Page: | S684 |
Journal / Book Title: | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |
Volume: | 469 |
Issue: | Suppl_2 |
Copyright Statement: | © 2017 The Authors. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. |
Sponsor/Funder: | The Royal Society Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) |
Funder's Grant Number: | RP140004 ST/P006922/1 |
Keywords: | Science & Technology Physical Sciences Astronomy & Astrophysics magnetic fields plasmas waves space vehicles: instruments ELECTRON-DRIFT INSTRUMENT MAGNETIC-FIELD DATA EARTHS MAGNETOSHEATH LION ROARS SOLAR-WIND WAVES CALIBRATION SPACECRAFT CLUSTER PERFORMANCE 0201 Astronomical And Space Sciences |
Publication Status: | Published |
Online Publication Date: | 2017-09-28 |
Appears in Collections: | Space and Atmospheric Physics Physics Faculty of Natural Sciences |