100
IRUS Total
Downloads

Protecting scientists from Gordon Gekko: how organizations use hybrid spaces to engage with multiple institutional logics

File Description SizeFormat 
orsc.2018.1228.pdfPublished version1.3 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Protecting scientists from Gordon Gekko: how organizations use hybrid spaces to engage with multiple institutional logics
Authors: Perkmann, M
McKelvey, M
Phillips, N
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Previous work on institutional complexity has discussed two solutions that organizations deploy internally when engaging externally with multiple institutional logics: blended hybrids where logics are combined throughout the organization, and structural hybrids where different logics dominate in different compartments within the organization. While blended hybrids have been extensively investigated, few studies have examined how structural hybrids are constructed and maintained. We address this imbalance by studying university-industry research centers as instances of distinct organizational spaces used to engage with a minority logic. We found that these spaces require three kinds of work: (a) leveraging, where dominant logic practices are drawn on to achieve minority logic objectives; (b) hybridizing, where the practices inside the space are modified to allow engagement with the minority logic; and (c) bolstering, where the space is shielded against excessive minority logic influence and anchored back into the organization. Furthermore, contrary to the existing literature we found that the spaces were hybrid, rather than being dominated by a single logic. Our finding is likely generalizable across many instances of structural hybrids given the integration problems that organizations with pure single logic spaces would face, combined with the usefulness of hybrid spaces. Our study is novel in revealing the work needed to sustain hybrid spaces and questioning the previously held conceptualization of structural hybrids as made up of single-logic compartments.
Issue Date: Mar-2019
Date of Acceptance: 24-Apr-2018
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/59712
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2018.1228
ISSN: 1047-7039
Publisher: INFORMS
Start Page: 298
End Page: 318
Journal / Book Title: Organization Science
Volume: 30
Issue: 2
Copyright Statement: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalLicense. You are free to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this work, but you must attribute this workas“Organization Science. Copyright © 2018 The Author(s).https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1228,usedunder a Creative Commons Attribution License:https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.”
Sponsor/Funder: Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC)
Funder's Grant Number: ES/G038082/1
Keywords: Social Sciences
Management
Business & Economics
institutional complexity
institutional logics
hybrid organizations
institutional theory
university-industry relations
BUSINESS MODELS
COMPLEXITY
INNOVATION
UNIVERSITY
ENTREPRENEURS
CONFORMITY
ECONOMICS
RESPONSES
INDUSTRY
SCIENCE
institutional complexity; institutional logics; hybrid organizations; institutional theory; university-industry relations
Business & Management
1503 Business and Management
1505 Marketing
Publication Status: Published
Online Publication Date: 2018-11-26
Appears in Collections:Imperial College Business School