116
IRUS Total
Downloads
  Altmetric

Total recall in the SCAMP Cohort: Validation of self-reported mobile phone use in the smartphone era

File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S001393511731664X-main.pdfPublished version1.4 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Total recall in the SCAMP Cohort: Validation of self-reported mobile phone use in the smartphone era
Authors: Toledano, MB
Mueller, W
Fleming, C
Chang, I
Dumontheil, I
Thomas, MSC
Eeftens, M
Elliott, P
Mireku, MO
Röösli, M
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Mobile phone use, predominantly smartphones, is almost ubiquitous amongst both adults and children. However adults and children have different usage patterns. A major challenge with research on mobile phone use is the reliability of self-reported phone activity for accurate exposure assessment. We investigated the agreement between self-reported mobile phone use data and objective mobile operator traffic data in a subset of adolescents aged 11-12 years participating in the Study of Cognition, Adolescents and Mobile Phones (SCAMP) cohort. We examined self-reported mobile phone use, including call frequency, cumulative call time duration and text messages sent among adolescents from SCAMP and matched these data with records provided by mobile network operators (n = 350). The extent of agreement between self-reported mobile phone use and mobile operator traffic data use was evaluated using Cohen's weighted Kappa (ĸ) statistics. Sensitivity and specificity of self-reported low (< 1 call/day, ≤ 5min of call/day or ≤ 5 text messages sent/day) and high (≥ 11 calls/day, > 30min of call/day or ≥ 11 text messages sent /day) use were estimated. Agreement between self-reported mobile phone use and mobile operator traffic data was highest for the duration spent talking on mobile phones per day on weekdays (38.9%) and weekends (29.4%) compared to frequency of calls and number of text messages sent. Adolescents overestimated their mobile phone use during weekends compared to weekdays. Analysis of agreement showed little difference overall between the sexes and socio-economic groups. Weighted kappa between self-reported and mobile operator traffic data for call frequency during weekdays was κ = 0.12, 95% CI 0.06-0.18. Of the three modes of mobile phone use measured in the questionnaire, call frequency was the most sensitive for low mobile phone users on weekdays and weekends (77.1, 95% CI: 69.3-83.7 and 72.0, 95% CI: 65.0-78.4, respectively). Specificity was moderate to high for high users with the highest for call frequency during weekdays (98.4, 95% CI: 96.4-99.5). Despite differential agreement between adolescents' self-reported mobile phone use and mobile operator traffic data, our findings demonstrate that self-reported usage adequately distinguishes between high and low use. The greater use of mobile smartphones over Wi-Fi networks by adolescents, as opposed to mobile phone networks, means operator data are not the gold standard for exposure assessment in this age group. This has important implications for epidemiologic research on the health effects of mobile phone use in adolescents.
Issue Date: 30-Oct-2017
Date of Acceptance: 22-Oct-2017
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/52489
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.034
ISSN: 0013-9351
Publisher: Elsevier
Start Page: 1
End Page: 8
Journal / Book Title: Environmental Research
Volume: 161
Copyright Statement: © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0/).
Sponsor/Funder: Medical Research Council (MRC)
National Institute for Health Research
Medical Research Council (MRC)
National Institute for Health Research
Public Health England
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust- BRC Funding
UK Department of Health via the Research Initiative on Health and Mobile Telecommunications
Funder's Grant Number: G0801056B
NF-SI-0611-10136
MR/L01341X/1
RTJ6219303-1
6509268
RDF03
Reference number: 091/0212
Keywords: Adolescents
Exposure measurement error
Mobile phones
SCAMP
03 Chemical Sciences
05 Environmental Sciences
06 Biological Sciences
Toxicology
Publication Status: Published
Appears in Collections:School of Public Health