IRUS Total

Long-term Outcomes After Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Sclerosis

File Description SizeFormat 
Accepted Article complete.pdfAccepted version995.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Long-term Outcomes After Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Sclerosis
Authors: Muraro, PA
Pasquini, M
Atkins, HL
Bowen, JD
Farge, D
Fassas, A
Freedman, MS
Georges, GE
Gualandi, F
Hamerschlak, N
Havrdova, E
Kimiskidis, VK
Kozak, T
Mancardi, GL
Massacesi, L
Moraes, DA
Nash, RA
Pavletic, S
Ouyang, J
Rovira, M
Saiz, A
Simoes, B
Trneny, M
Zhu, L
Badoglio, M
Zhong, X
Sormani, MP
Saccardi, R
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Importance: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) may be effective in aggressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) that fail to respond to standard therapies. Objective: To evaluate the long-term outcomes in patients who underwent AHSCT for the treatment of MS in a large multicenter cohort. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data were obtained in a multicenter, observational, retrospective cohort study. Eligibility criteria were receipt of AHSCT for the treatment of MS between January 1995 and December 2006 and the availability of a prespecified minimum data set comprising the disease subtype at baseline; the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score at baseline; information on the administered conditioning regimen and graft manipulation; and at least 1 follow-up visit or report after transplant. The last patient visit was on July 1, 2012. To avoid bias, all eligible patients were included in the analysis regardless of their duration of follow-up. Data analysis was conducted from September 1, 2014 to April 27, 2015. Exposures: Demographic, disease-related, and treatment-related exposures were considered variables of interest, including age, disease subtype, baseline EDSS score, number of previous disease-modifying treatments, and intensity of the conditioning regimen. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were MS progression-free survival and overall survival. The probabilities of progression-free survival and overall survival were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis models. Results: Valid data were obtained from 25 centers in 13 countries for 281 evaluable patients, with median follow-up of 6.6 years (range, 0.2-16 years). Seventy-eight percent (218 of 281) of patients had progressive forms of MS. The median EDSS score before mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells was 6.5 (range, 1.5-9). Eight deaths (2.8%; 95% CI, 1.0%-4.9%) were reported within 100 days of transplant and were considered transplant-related mortality. The 5-year probability of progression-free survival as assessed by the EDSS score was 46% (95% CI, 42%-54%), and overall survival was 93% (95% CI, 89%-96%) at 5 years. Factors associated with neurological progression after transplant were older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05), progressive vs relapsing form of MS (HR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.27-4.28), and more than 2 previous disease-modifying therapies (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.10-2.47). Higher baseline EDSS score was associated with worse overall survival (HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.40-2.95). Conclusions and Relevance: In this observational study of patients with MS treated with AHSCT, almost half of them remained free from neurological progression for 5 years after transplant. Younger age, relapsing form of MS, fewer prior immunotherapies, and lower baseline EDSS score were factors associated with better outcomes. The results support the rationale for further randomized clinical trials of AHSCT for the treatment of MS.
Issue Date: 1-Apr-2017
Date of Acceptance: 8-Dec-2016
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/49926
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.5867
ISSN: 2168-6149
Publisher: American Medical Association
Start Page: 459
End Page: 469
Journal / Book Title: JAMA Neurology
Volume: 74
Issue: 4
Copyright Statement: © 2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Clinical Neurology
Neurosciences & Neurology
Publication Status: Published
Online Publication Date: 2017-02-20
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Medicine
Department of Brain Sciences