584
IRUS TotalDownloads
Altmetric
A Techno-economic analysis and systematic review of carbon capture and storage (CCS) applied to the iron and steel, cement, oil refining and pulp and paper industries, as well as other high purity sources
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S175058361730289X-main.pdf | Published version | 2.09 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Title: | A Techno-economic analysis and systematic review of carbon capture and storage (CCS) applied to the iron and steel, cement, oil refining and pulp and paper industries, as well as other high purity sources |
Authors: | Leeson, D Mac Dowell, N Shah, N Petit, C Fennell, PS |
Item Type: | Journal Article |
Abstract: | In order to meet the IPCC recommendation for an 80% cut in CO2 emissions by 2050, industries will be required to drastically reduce their emissions. To meet these targets, technologies such as carbon capture and storage (CCS) must be part of the economic set of decarbonisation options for industry. A systematic review of the literature has been carried out on four of the largest industrial sectors (the iron and steel industry, the cement industry, the petroleum refining industry and the pulp and paper industry) as well as selected high-purity sources of CO2 from other industries to assess the applicability of different CCS technologies. Costing data have been gathered, and for the cement, iron and steel and refining industries, these data are used in a model to project costs per tonne of CO2 avoided over the time period extending from first deployment until 2050. A sensitivity analysis was carried out on the model to assess which variables had the greatest impact on the overall cost of wide-scale CCS deployment for future better targeting of cost reduction measures. The factors found to have the greatest overall impact were the initial cost of CCS at the start of deployment and the start date at which large scale deployment is started, whilst a slower initial deployment rate after the start date also leads to significantly increased costs. |
Issue Date: | 10-Apr-2017 |
Date of Acceptance: | 20-Mar-2017 |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/45768 |
DOI: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.03.020 |
ISSN: | 1750-5836 |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Start Page: | 71 |
End Page: | 84 |
Journal / Book Title: | International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control |
Volume: | 61 |
Copyright Statement: | © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
Sponsor/Funder: | Engineering & Physical Science Research Council (E |
Funder's Grant Number: | ERI 023708/EP/K000446/1 |
Keywords: | Energy 04 Earth Sciences 05 Environmental Sciences 09 Engineering |
Publication Status: | Published |
Appears in Collections: | Centre for Environmental Policy Chemical Engineering Faculty of Natural Sciences Faculty of Engineering |