IRUS Total

Barriers to effectiveness: artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs) and the health system

File Description SizeFormat 
Rao-B-2014-PhD-Thesis.pdfRao-B-2014-PhD-Thesis8.98 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Barriers to effectiveness: artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs) and the health system
Authors: Rao, Bhargavi
Item Type: Thesis or dissertation
Abstract: As international funding for malaria programmes plateaus, it is critical to better understand how to implement interventions such as first-line Artemisinin Combination Therapies (ACTs) most effectively through an existing health system. This thesis presents an expansion of a mathematical model of malaria transmission to provide insight to the role of health systems factors as barriers to the effectiveness of ACTs, and interventions to overcome them; considering dimensions of access to care, different sectors through which care is delivered, and the quality of care provided. Data from the IMPACT 2 study in Tanzania was used to parameterise this approach. Primary-care based interventions had most impact on transmission. In low-prevalence scenarios some single interventions, e.g. ensuring 100% care-seeking, eliminated parasite prevalence. Diagnostic-led therapy with adequate stocks of ACTs was as effective in all settings as a policy of presumptive treatment, reducing parasite prevalence in under-fives in moderate transmission settings by up to 86% depending on the sector of implementation. Modelling combinations of hospital-based interventions shifted the pattern of severe malaria away from a peak at early ages (greater than 70% relative reduction in 0-5 year olds in medium transmission settings) towards a more sustained lower incidence across 0-20 years of age as seen in low prevalence settings. This was not immune-mediated and demonstrates the role of health systems interventions preventing the development of severe malaria in those at risk, and reducing mortality. Weak health systems and a poorly controlled diversity of antimalarial sources act as barriers to deploying ACTs effectively both as a control measure and first-line treatment. Addressing these constraints needs consideration of existing healthcare provision and local priorities, e.g. reducing ACT wastage, but through specific planning may improve progress towards targets set by Roll Back Malaria to decrease clinical disease and mortality, and in low transmission settings, to approach elimination.
Content Version: Open Access
Issue Date: Feb-2015
Date Awarded: Jul-2015
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/25267
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25560/25267
Supervisor: Ghani, Azra
Sponsor/Funder: Wellcome Trust (London, England)
Funder's Grant Number: WPIA P30312
Department: School of Public Health
Publisher: Imperial College London
Qualification Level: Doctoral
Qualification Name: Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Appears in Collections:School of Public Health PhD Theses

Unless otherwise indicated, items in Spiral are protected by copyright and are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial NoDerivatives License.

Creative Commons