2
IRUS Total
Downloads
  Altmetric

Global terrestrial nitrogen uptake and nitrogen use efficiency

Title: Global terrestrial nitrogen uptake and nitrogen use efficiency
Authors: Peng, Y
Prentice, IC
Bloomfield, KJ
Campioli, M
Guo, Z
Sun, Y
Tian, D
Wang, X
Vicca, S
Stocker, BD
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: 1. Plant biomass production (BP), nitrogen uptake (Nup) and their ratio, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), must be quantified to understand how nitrogen (N) cycling constrains terrestrial carbon (C) uptake. But the controls of key plant processes determining Nup and NUE, including BP, C and N allocation, tissue C:N ratios and N resorption efficiency (NRE), remain poorly known. 2. We compiled measurements from 804 forest and grassland sites and derived regression models for each of these processes with growth temperature, vapour pressure deficit, stand age, soil C:N ratio, fAPAR (remotely sensed fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by green vegetation) and growing-season average daily incident photosynthetic photon flux density (gPPFD) (effectively the seasonal concentration of light availability, which increases polewards) as predictors. An empirical model for leaf N was based on optimal photosynthetic capacity (a function of gPPFD and climate) and observed leaf mass-per-area. The models were used to produce global maps of Nup and NUE. 3. Global BP was estimated as 72 Pg C/yr; Nup as 950 Tg N/yr; and NUE as 76 gC/gN. Forest BP was found to increase with growth temperature and fAPAR and to decrease with stand age, soil C:N ratio and gPPFD. Forest NUE is controlled primarily by climate through its effect on C allocation – especially to leaves, being richer in N than other tissues. NUE is greater in colder climates, where N is less readily available, because belowground allocation is increased. NUE is also greater in drier climates because leaf allocation is reduced. NRE is enhanced (further promoting NUE) in both cold and dry climates. 4. These findings can provide observationally based benchmarks for model representations of C–N cycle coupling. State-of-the-art vegetation models in the TRENDY ensemble showed variable performance against these benchmarks, and models including coupled C–N cycling produced relatively poor simulations of Nup and NUE.
Issue Date: Dec-2023
Date of Acceptance: 18-Sep-2023
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/106945
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.14208
ISSN: 0022-0477
Publisher: Wiley
Start Page: 2676
End Page: 2693
Journal / Book Title: Journal of Ecology
Volume: 111
Issue: 12
Copyright Statement: © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Publication Status: Published
Online Publication Date: 2023-10-18
Appears in Collections:Grantham Institute for Climate Change
Faculty of Natural Sciences



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons