15
IRUS Total
Downloads
  Altmetric

A unified framework for the thermo-economic optimisation of compressed-air energy storage systems with solid and liquid thermal stores

File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0196890423004077-main.pdfPublished version4.8 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: A unified framework for the thermo-economic optimisation of compressed-air energy storage systems with solid and liquid thermal stores
Authors: Mersch, M
Sapin, P
Olympios, AV
Ding, Y
Mac Dowell, N
Markides, CN
Item Type: Journal Article
Abstract: Compressed-air energy storage is an attractive option for satisfying the increasing storage demands of electricity grids with high shares of renewable generation. It is a proven technology that can store multiple gigawatt hours of electricity for hours, days and even weeks at a competitive cost and efficiency. However, compressed–air energy storage plants need to be designed carefully to deliver these benefits. In this work, a consistent thermo-economic optimisation framework is applied to assess the performance and costs of different compressed–air energy storage configurations across different scales. Special attention is paid to the thermal energy stores, with both solid packed-bed stores and liquid stores examined as viable options for advanced compressed–air energy storage plants and different storage materials proposed for both options. The comprehensive thermo-economic optimisation, considering different system layouts, thermal energy storage technologies and storage materials, and system scales is a key novelty of the presented work. A configuration with two packed–bed thermal energy stores using Basalt as the storage material is found to perform best, achieving an energy capital cost of 140 $/kWh, a power capital cost of 970 $/kW and a roundtrip efficiency of 76% at a nominal discharge power of 50 MW and a charging / discharging duration of 6 h. The best-performing liquid storage material is solar salt, which is associated with an energy capital cost of 170 $/kWh and a power capital cost of 1,230 $/kW. Systems with liquid thermal energy stores however are found generally to perform worse than systems with packed–bed thermal energy stores both in terms of cost and efficiency across all scales.
Issue Date: Jul-2023
Date of Acceptance: 14-Apr-2023
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/103731
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117061
ISSN: 0196-8904
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Start Page: 1
End Page: 15
Journal / Book Title: Energy Conversion and Management
Volume: 287
Copyright Statement: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Publication Status: Published
Article Number: 117061
Online Publication Date: 2023-04-29
Appears in Collections:Centre for Environmental Policy
Chemical Engineering
Faculty of Natural Sciences



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons