Cosmological parameters, shear maps and power spectra from CFHTLenS using Bayesian hierarchical inference
File(s)stw3161.pdf (3.46 MB)
Published version
Author(s)
Alsing, J
Heavens, A
Jaffe, AH
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
We apply two Bayesian hierarchical inference schemes to infer shear power spectra, shear maps and cosmological parameters from the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope (CFHTLenS) weak lensing survey – the first application of this method to data. In the first approach, we sample the joint posterior distribution of the shear maps and power spectra by Gibbs sampling, with minimal model assumptions. In the second approach, we sample the joint posterior of the shear maps and cosmological parameters, providing a new, accurate and principled approach to cosmological parameter inference from cosmic shear data. As a first demonstration on data, we perform a two-bin tomographic analysis to constrain cosmological parameters and investigate the possibility of photometric redshift bias in the CFHTLenS data. Under the baseline ΛCDM (Λ cold dark matter) model, we constrain
S8=σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5=0.67+0.03−0.03
S8=σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5=0.67−0.03+0.03
(68 per cent), consistent with previous CFHTLenS analyses but in tension with Planck. Adding neutrino mass as a free parameter, we are able to constrain ∑mν < 4.6 eV (95 per cent) using CFHTLenS data alone. Including a linear redshift-dependent photo-z bias Δz = p2(z − p1), we find
p1=−0.25+0.53−0.60
p1=−0.25−0.60+0.53
and
p2=−0.15+0.17−0.15
p2=−0.15−0.15+0.17
, and tension with Planck is only alleviated under very conservative prior assumptions. Neither the non-minimal neutrino mass nor photo-z bias models are significantly preferred by the CFHTLenS (two-bin tomography) data.
S8=σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5=0.67+0.03−0.03
S8=σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5=0.67−0.03+0.03
(68 per cent), consistent with previous CFHTLenS analyses but in tension with Planck. Adding neutrino mass as a free parameter, we are able to constrain ∑mν < 4.6 eV (95 per cent) using CFHTLenS data alone. Including a linear redshift-dependent photo-z bias Δz = p2(z − p1), we find
p1=−0.25+0.53−0.60
p1=−0.25−0.60+0.53
and
p2=−0.15+0.17−0.15
p2=−0.15−0.15+0.17
, and tension with Planck is only alleviated under very conservative prior assumptions. Neither the non-minimal neutrino mass nor photo-z bias models are significantly preferred by the CFHTLenS (two-bin tomography) data.
Date Issued
2016-12-10
Date Acceptance
2016-12-02
Citation
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 466 (3), pp.3272-3292
ISSN
0035-8711
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Start Page
3272
End Page
3292
Journal / Book Title
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume
466
Issue
3
Copyright Statement
© 2016 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000398418600053&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Subjects
Science & Technology
Physical Sciences
Astronomy & Astrophysics
gravitational lensing: weak
methods: statistical
cosmological parameters
large-scale structure of Universe
MICROWAVE BACKGROUND DATA
TELESCOPE LENSING SURVEY
COSMIC SHEAR
REDSHIFT DISTRIBUTIONS
GALAXY SURVEYS
PLANCK CMB
LIKELIHOOD
APPROXIMATION
CONSTRAINTS
DISCORDANCE
0201 Astronomical And Space Sciences
Publication Status
Published