Differentiated effects of the multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine on sleep architecture: Part 1, a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic comparison with paroxetine in healthy men
Author(s)
Wilson, S
Hojer, A-M
Buchberg, J
Areberg, J
Nutt, DJ
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
We compared the effect of vortioxetine, paroxetine and placebo after three days of dosing on sleep architecture. This was a randomised, double-blind, four-way crossover, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose study in 24 healthy young men. Subjects received 20mg vortioxetine, 40mg vortioxetine, 20mg paroxetine or placebo for three consecutive days in four different periods with at least three weeks between them. Polysomnography and blood sampling for pharmacokinetic analysis were performed on the pre-dose night and nights 1 and 3 of dosing in each period. Plasma concentrations of vortioxetine and paroxetine during the polysomnography measurement were used to estimate SERT occupancies using published relationships in healthy subjects.
All three active treatments significantly increased REM onset latency and decreased time spent in REM sleep. In the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics analysis significant relationships were found between REM onset latency and time spent in REM sleep and vortioxetine/paroxetine exposure. The relation between REM suppression parameters and SERT occupancy was significantly different between vortioxetine and paroxetine, despite the same SERT occupancy. This indicates that vortioxetine has a different clinical pharmacological profile from paroxetine, which may explain the differences in adverse effect profile of the two drugs, for instance the lower incidence of nausea, weight gain and sexual dysfunction with vortioxetine.
All three active treatments significantly increased REM onset latency and decreased time spent in REM sleep. In the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics analysis significant relationships were found between REM onset latency and time spent in REM sleep and vortioxetine/paroxetine exposure. The relation between REM suppression parameters and SERT occupancy was significantly different between vortioxetine and paroxetine, despite the same SERT occupancy. This indicates that vortioxetine has a different clinical pharmacological profile from paroxetine, which may explain the differences in adverse effect profile of the two drugs, for instance the lower incidence of nausea, weight gain and sexual dysfunction with vortioxetine.
Date Issued
2015-08-07
Date Acceptance
2015-08-01
Citation
Journal of Psychopharmacology, 2015, 29 (10), pp.1085-1091
ISSN
1461-7285
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Start Page
1085
End Page
1091
Journal / Book Title
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Volume
29
Issue
10
Copyright Statement
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License.
License URL
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Clinical Neurology
Neurosciences
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Psychiatry
Neurosciences & Neurology
Sleep
serotonin
vortioxetine
MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER
LU AA21004
SEROTONIN TRANSPORTER
RECEPTOR
METAANALYSIS
ACTIVATION
CITALOPRAM
OCCUPANCY
COMPOUND
AGONIST
Adult
Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation
Cross-Over Studies
Double-Blind Method
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Male
Paroxetine
Piperazines
Polysomnography
Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors
Sleep, REM
Sulfides
Young Adult
11 Medical And Health Sciences
17 Psychology And Cognitive Sciences
Publication Status
Published