A clinical "near miss" highlights risk management issues surrounding ultrasound-guided and wire-localised breast resections.
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background:
The introduction of the National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programme has led to a
considerable increase in the detection of impalpable breast cancer. Patients with impalpable breast cancer typically
undergo oncological resection facilitated either by the insertion of guide wires placed stereo-tactically or through
ultra-sound guided skin markings to delineate the extent of a lesion. The need for radiological interventions on the
day of surgery adds complexity and introduces the risk that a patient may accidentally transferred to the operating
room directly without the image guidance procedure.
Case report:
A case is described of a patient who required a pre-operative ultrasound scan in order to localise an
impalpable breast cancer but who was accidentally taken directly to the operating theatre (OR) and anaesthetised
without pre-operative intervention. The radiologist was called to the OR and an on-table ultrasound was performed
without further consequence.
Conclusion:
It is evident that breast cancer patients undergoing image-guided resection are exposed to an
additional layer of clinical risks. These risks are not offset by the World Health Organisation surgical safety checklist
in its present guise. Here, we review a number of simple and inexpensive changes to the system that may improve
the safety of the breast cancer patient undergoing surgery.
The introduction of the National Health Service (NHS) Breast Screening Programme has led to a
considerable increase in the detection of impalpable breast cancer. Patients with impalpable breast cancer typically
undergo oncological resection facilitated either by the insertion of guide wires placed stereo-tactically or through
ultra-sound guided skin markings to delineate the extent of a lesion. The need for radiological interventions on the
day of surgery adds complexity and introduces the risk that a patient may accidentally transferred to the operating
room directly without the image guidance procedure.
Case report:
A case is described of a patient who required a pre-operative ultrasound scan in order to localise an
impalpable breast cancer but who was accidentally taken directly to the operating theatre (OR) and anaesthetised
without pre-operative intervention. The radiologist was called to the OR and an on-table ultrasound was performed
without further consequence.
Conclusion:
It is evident that breast cancer patients undergoing image-guided resection are exposed to an
additional layer of clinical risks. These risks are not offset by the World Health Organisation surgical safety checklist
in its present guise. Here, we review a number of simple and inexpensive changes to the system that may improve
the safety of the breast cancer patient undergoing surgery.
Date Issued
2012-07-16
Date Acceptance
2012-07-16
Citation
Patient Safety in Surgery, 2012, 6 (1)
ISSN
1754-9493
Publisher
BioMed Central
Journal / Book Title
Patient Safety in Surgery
Volume
6
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© 2012 Leff et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Subjects
1103 Clinical Sciences
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
15