Singing for Lung Health – a systematic review of the literature and consensus statement.
File(s)
Published version
Author(s)
Hopkinson, NS
Russell, A
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Abstract:
There is growing interest in Singing for Lung Health (SLH), an approach where patients with respiratory disease take part in singing groups, intended to improve their condition. A consensus group was convened in early 2016 to address issues including; the specific features that make SLH distinct from other forms of participation in singing; the existing evidence base via a systematic review; gaps in the evidence base including the need to define value-based outcome measures for sustainable commissioning of SLH; defining the measures needed to evaluate individuals' responses to SLH and the quality of singing programmes; core training, expertise and competencies required by singing group leaders to deliver high quality programmes.
A systematic review to establish the extent of the evidence base for Singing for Lung Health was undertaken. Electronic databases including Pubmed, OVID Medline and Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane central register of controlled trials and PEDro were used. Six studies were included in the final review. Quantitative data suggest singing has the potential to improve health related quality of life, particularly related to physical health, and levels of anxiety without causing significant side effects. There is a significant risk of bias in many of the existing studies with small numbers of subjects overall. Little comparison can be made between studies due to their heterogeneity in design.
Qualitative data indicate that singing is an enjoyable experience for patients who consistently report that it helps them to cope with their condition better.
Larger and longer term trials are needed.
There is growing interest in Singing for Lung Health (SLH), an approach where patients with respiratory disease take part in singing groups, intended to improve their condition. A consensus group was convened in early 2016 to address issues including; the specific features that make SLH distinct from other forms of participation in singing; the existing evidence base via a systematic review; gaps in the evidence base including the need to define value-based outcome measures for sustainable commissioning of SLH; defining the measures needed to evaluate individuals' responses to SLH and the quality of singing programmes; core training, expertise and competencies required by singing group leaders to deliver high quality programmes.
A systematic review to establish the extent of the evidence base for Singing for Lung Health was undertaken. Electronic databases including Pubmed, OVID Medline and Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane central register of controlled trials and PEDro were used. Six studies were included in the final review. Quantitative data suggest singing has the potential to improve health related quality of life, particularly related to physical health, and levels of anxiety without causing significant side effects. There is a significant risk of bias in many of the existing studies with small numbers of subjects overall. Little comparison can be made between studies due to their heterogeneity in design.
Qualitative data indicate that singing is an enjoyable experience for patients who consistently report that it helps them to cope with their condition better.
Larger and longer term trials are needed.
Date Issued
2016-12-01
Date Acceptance
2016-09-20
Citation
npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, 2016, 26
ISSN
2055-1010
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
Journal / Book Title
npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
Volume
26
Copyright Statement
© 2016The Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License URL
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
16080