Pre-emptive morphine during therapeutic hypothermia after neonatal encephalopathy: a secondary analysis
File(s)Accepted Manuscript.pdf (1.55 MB)
Accepted version
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Although therapeutic hypothermia (TH) improves outcomes after neonatal encephalopathy (NE), the safety and efficacy of preemptive opioid sedation during cooling therapy is unclear. We performed a secondary analysis of the data from a large multicountry prospective observational study (Magnetic Resonance Biomarkers in Neonatal Encephalopathy [MARBLE]) to examine the association of preemptive morphine infusion during TH on brain injury and neurodevelopmental outcomes after NE. All recruited infants had 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy at 1 week, and neurodevelopmental outcome assessments at 22 months. Of 223 babies recruited to the MARBLE study, the data on sedation were available from 169 babies with moderate (n = 150) or severe NE (n = 19). Although the baseline characteristics and admission status were similar, the babies who received morphine infusion (n = 141) were more hypotensive (49% vs. 25%, p = 0.02) and had a significantly longer hospital stay (12 days vs. 9 days, p = 0.009) than those who did not (n = 28). Basal ganglia/thalamic injury (score ≥1) and cortical injury (score ≥1) was seen in 34/141 (24%) and 37/141 (26%), respectively, of the morphine group and 4/28 (14%) and 3/28 (11%) of the nonmorphine group (p > 0.05). On regression modeling adjusted for potential confounders, preemptive morphine was not associated with mean (standard deviation [SD]) thalamic N-acetylaspartate (NAA) concentration (6.9 ± 0.9 vs. 6.5 ± 1.5; p = 0.97), and median (interquartile range) lactate/NAA peak area ratios (0.16 [0.12–0.21] vs. 0.13 [0.11–0.18]; p = 0.20) at 1 week, and mean (SD) Bayley-III composite motor (92 ± 23 vs. 94 ± 10; p = 0.98), language (89 ± 22 vs. 93 ± 8; p = 0.53), and cognitive scores (95 ± 21 vs. 99 ± 13; p = 0.56) at 22 months. Adverse neurodevelopmental outcome (adjusted for severity of encephalopathy) was seen in 26 (18%) of the morphine group, and none of the nonmorphine group (p = 0.11). Preemptive morphine sedation during TH does not offer any neuroprotective benefits and may be associated with increased hospital stay. Optimal sedation during induced hypothermia requires further evaluation in clinical trials.
Date Issued
2019-02-10
Date Acceptance
2019-01-30
Citation
Therapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature Management, 2019, 10 (1), pp.45-52
ISSN
2153-7658
Publisher
Mary Ann Liebert
Start Page
45
End Page
52
Journal / Book Title
Therapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature Management
Volume
10
Issue
1
Copyright Statement
© 2019, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers. Final publication is available from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers: https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/ther.2018.0052
Sponsor
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust- BRC Funding
National Institute for Health Research
National Institute for Health Research
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Medical Research Council (MRC)
Cerebral Palsy Alliance
Health Education England (HEE)
Grant Number
RDD01 79560
NIHR/CS/010/022
n/a
RDD10
MR/R001375/1
PG08117
ICA-CDRF-2016-02-071
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Critical Care Medicine
General & Internal Medicine
hypothermia
neonatal encephalopathy
sedation
MR spectroscopy
WHOLE-BODY HYPOTHERMIA
SYSTEMIC HYPOTHERMIA
CONTROLLED-TRIAL
OUTCOMES
MULTICENTER
ANALGESIA
INFANT
MR spectroscopy
hypothermia
neonatal encephalopathy
sedation
Publication Status
Published
Date Publish Online
2019-02-26