A biomechanical testing method to assess tissue adhesives for annulus closure
File(s)1-s2.0-S175161612200073X-mmc1.docx (238.67 KB) 1-s2.0-S175161612200073X-main.pdf (2.38 MB)
Published version
Published version
Author(s)
Caldeira, Joana
Celiz, Adam
Newell, Nicolas
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration has been linked to Low Back Pain (LBP) which affects over 80% of the population ranking first in terms of disability worldwide. Degeneration progresses with age and is often accompanied by annulus fibrosus (AF) tearing and nucleus pulposus (NP) herniation. Existing therapies fail to restore IVD function and may worsen AF defects, increasing the risk of reherniation in nearly 30% of patients. Current AF closure options are ineffective, presenting biological or mechanical limitations. Bioadhesives have potential use in this area, however methods to assess performance are limited. Herein, we propose a biomechanical testing method to assess bioadhesives’ capacity to seal AF tears.
Two candidate bioadhesives to seal AF tears were evaluated; a tough hydrogel adhesive, and a cyanoacrylate-based glue. The adhesion energy at the interface between bovine discs and the tough hydrogel adhesive was quantified using a peel test (n=4). An experimental method to measure the burst pressure of IVDs was then developed. This method was used to quantify the burst pressure of intact (n=7), injured (AF punctured with a 21G needle; n=7), and sealed IVDs (after applying either the tough hydrogel adhesive patch as a sealant; n=5, or the cyanoacrylate-based glue over the AF tear; n=6).
The tough adhesive yielded a strong adhesion energy of 239 ± 49 J/m2 during the peel tests. A maximum pressure of 13.2 ± 3.8 MPa was observed for intact discs in the burst pressure tests, which reduced by 61.4% to 5.1 ± 1.5 MPa in the injured IVDs (p < 0.01)). Application of a cyanoacrylate-based glue to injured IVDs did not recover the burst pressure with statistical significance, however, application of the tough adhesive to injured IVDs, restored burst pressure to 12.3 ± 4.5 MPa, which was not significantly different to the intact burst pressures.
In this study, a simple biomechanical method to assess the performance of bioadhesives to seal AF tears based upon burst pressure has been established. Using this method it was found that a tough hydrogel adhesive was able to seal an AF injury, such that the IVD burst pressures were similar to those measured in intact specimens. This method can be used to provide a biomechanical assessment of bioadhesives under high magnitude loading and can complement existing cyclic testing methods that are currently used to assess AF closure devices, improving their assessment before clinical use.
Two candidate bioadhesives to seal AF tears were evaluated; a tough hydrogel adhesive, and a cyanoacrylate-based glue. The adhesion energy at the interface between bovine discs and the tough hydrogel adhesive was quantified using a peel test (n=4). An experimental method to measure the burst pressure of IVDs was then developed. This method was used to quantify the burst pressure of intact (n=7), injured (AF punctured with a 21G needle; n=7), and sealed IVDs (after applying either the tough hydrogel adhesive patch as a sealant; n=5, or the cyanoacrylate-based glue over the AF tear; n=6).
The tough adhesive yielded a strong adhesion energy of 239 ± 49 J/m2 during the peel tests. A maximum pressure of 13.2 ± 3.8 MPa was observed for intact discs in the burst pressure tests, which reduced by 61.4% to 5.1 ± 1.5 MPa in the injured IVDs (p < 0.01)). Application of a cyanoacrylate-based glue to injured IVDs did not recover the burst pressure with statistical significance, however, application of the tough adhesive to injured IVDs, restored burst pressure to 12.3 ± 4.5 MPa, which was not significantly different to the intact burst pressures.
In this study, a simple biomechanical method to assess the performance of bioadhesives to seal AF tears based upon burst pressure has been established. Using this method it was found that a tough hydrogel adhesive was able to seal an AF injury, such that the IVD burst pressures were similar to those measured in intact specimens. This method can be used to provide a biomechanical assessment of bioadhesives under high magnitude loading and can complement existing cyclic testing methods that are currently used to assess AF closure devices, improving their assessment before clinical use.
Date Issued
2022-03
Date Acceptance
2022-02-26
Citation
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2022, 129, pp.105150-105150
ISSN
1751-6161
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Start Page
105150
End Page
105150
Journal / Book Title
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Volume
129
Copyright Statement
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
License URL
Identifier
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175161612200073X?via%3Dihub
Subjects
Annulus fibrosus repair
Bioadhesive
Burst pressure test
Hydrogels
Intervertebral disc herniation
Biomedical Engineering
0903 Biomedical Engineering
0912 Materials Engineering
0913 Mechanical Engineering
Publication Status
Published online
Article Number
105150
Date Publish Online
2022-03-04