Observations from the IMPROVE trial concerning the clinical care of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Background: Single-centre series of the management of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic
aneurysm (AAA) are usually too small to identify clinical factors that could improve patient outcomes.
Methods: IMPROVE is a pragmatic, multicentre randomized clinical trial in which eligible patients with
a clinical diagnosis of ruptured aneurysm were allocated to a strategy of endovascular aneurysm repair
(EVAR) or to open repair. The influences of time and manner of hospital presentation, fluid volume
status, type of anaesthesia, type of endovascular repair and time to aneurysm repair on 30-day mortality
were investigated according to a prespecified plan, for the subgroup of patients with a proven diagnosis
of ruptured or symptomatic AAA. Adjustment was made for potential confounding factors.
Results: Some 558 of 613 randomized patients had a symptomatic or ruptured aneurysm: diagnostic
accuracy was 91·0 per cent. Patients randomized outside routine working hours had higher operative
mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1·47, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·00 to 2·17). Mortality rates
after primary and secondary presentation were similar. Lowest systolic blood pressure was strongly
and independently associated with 30-day mortality (51 per cent among those with pressure below 70
mmHg). Patients who received EVAR under local anaesthesia alone had greatly reduced 30-day mortality
compared with those who had general anaesthesia (adjusted OR 0·27, 0·10 to 0·70).
Conclusion: These findings suggest that the outcome of ruptured AAA might be improved by wider use
of local anaesthesia for EVAR and that a minimum blood pressure of 70 mmHg is too low a threshold
for permissive hypotension.
aneurysm (AAA) are usually too small to identify clinical factors that could improve patient outcomes.
Methods: IMPROVE is a pragmatic, multicentre randomized clinical trial in which eligible patients with
a clinical diagnosis of ruptured aneurysm were allocated to a strategy of endovascular aneurysm repair
(EVAR) or to open repair. The influences of time and manner of hospital presentation, fluid volume
status, type of anaesthesia, type of endovascular repair and time to aneurysm repair on 30-day mortality
were investigated according to a prespecified plan, for the subgroup of patients with a proven diagnosis
of ruptured or symptomatic AAA. Adjustment was made for potential confounding factors.
Results: Some 558 of 613 randomized patients had a symptomatic or ruptured aneurysm: diagnostic
accuracy was 91·0 per cent. Patients randomized outside routine working hours had higher operative
mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1·47, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·00 to 2·17). Mortality rates
after primary and secondary presentation were similar. Lowest systolic blood pressure was strongly
and independently associated with 30-day mortality (51 per cent among those with pressure below 70
mmHg). Patients who received EVAR under local anaesthesia alone had greatly reduced 30-day mortality
compared with those who had general anaesthesia (adjusted OR 0·27, 0·10 to 0·70).
Conclusion: These findings suggest that the outcome of ruptured AAA might be improved by wider use
of local anaesthesia for EVAR and that a minimum blood pressure of 70 mmHg is too low a threshold
for permissive hypotension.
Date Issued
2014-02-01
Date Acceptance
2013-11-22
Citation
British Journal of Surgery, 2014, 101 (3), pp.216-224
ISSN
1365-2168
Publisher
Wiley
Start Page
216
End Page
224
Journal / Book Title
British Journal of Surgery
Volume
101
Issue
3
Copyright Statement
2014 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Sponsor
Department of Health
National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme
Grant Number
07/37/64
HTA project 07/37/64
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Surgery
SURGERY
ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR
METAANALYSIS
MORTALITY
VOLUME
Publication Status
Published