Beyond fixes that fail: identifying sustainable improvements to tree seed supply and farmer participation in forest and landscape restoration
File(s)
Author(s)
Type
Journal Article
Abstract
Growing evidence suggests that constraints to the availability and quality of tree seed can undermine the success of forest and landscape restoration efforts and the delivery of associated benefits such as mitigating climate change and halting biodiversity loss. Past experiences to promote tree seed supply have frequently shown limited outcomes over time, partly because of unexpected, deleterious dynamics that emerged from the interventions themselves. In this study, we used a dynamic system approach to understand the inter-related problems that constrain the supply of good quality and site-adapted tree seeds to meet smallholders’ and other stakeholders’ demand in Burkina Faso and the Philippines, and to identify leverage points for intervention. Causal loop diagrams were constructed for each country, based on a framework of indicators of effective tree seed supply systems, literature review, semistructured interviews, and expert validation. The diagrams illustrate the complex interactions between planned interventions and their expected and unexpected effects that frequently lead to adverse outcomes. For example, the high turnover of forestry officers in municipalities to combat corruption in Burkina Faso combined with limited resources to support smallholders undermined the officers’ ability to strengthen local capacities in seedling production and sustainable forest management. In the Philippines, the imposition of rigid requirements for seedling survival rates as a condition for funding, in the absence of adequate time and resources for the production of quality seedlings and monitoring, resulted in exaggerated survival rates during reporting, which in turn hampered the detection and addressing of shortcomings. A dynamic system approach can help stakeholders recognize the broader impacts of their actions and jointly identify appropriate interventions, from developing more context-specific approaches to reconsidering investment criteria to balance benefits.
Date Issued
2020-12-01
Date Acceptance
2020-01-01
Citation
Ecology and Society: a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, 2020, 25 (4), pp.1-26
ISSN
1195-5449
Publisher
The Resilience Alliance
Start Page
1
End Page
26
Journal / Book Title
Ecology and Society: a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability
Volume
25
Issue
4
Copyright Statement
© 2020 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.
Go to the pdf version of this article
Go to the pdf version of this article
License URL
Identifier
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000603995100037&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
Subjects
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Ecology
Environmental Studies
Environmental Sciences & Ecology
forest landscape restoration
genetic diversity
smallholder involvement
system archetypes
system dynamics
NATURAL REGENERATION
COMMUNITY FORESTRY
AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS
LAW-ENFORCEMENT
NATIVE TREES
BURKINA-FASO
MANAGEMENT
REFORESTATION
DYNAMICS
DEFORESTATION
Publication Status
Published
Article Number
ARTN 30
Date Publish Online
2020-01